We have been talking in #4978 and various other issues (like #9582 ) to add API to specify store type facet inside query. While all they may be fine but we still need correct inference for all case if we want value converters to work correctly (since it come from actual type mapping). There wouldn't be any easy api to specify value converter to use for literal inside query.
Filing this issue to make inference accurate for all cases in 3.0 time frame. It shouldn't be impossible to decorate whole tree correctly. In case if we find cases which cannot be solved we can look into adding APIs to specify facets.
We have been talking in #4978 and various other issues (like #9582 ) to add API to specify store type facet inside query. While all they may be fine but we still need correct inference for all case if we want value converters to work correctly (since it come from actual type mapping). There wouldn't be any easy api to specify value converter to use for literal inside query.
Filing this issue to make inference accurate for all cases in 3.0 time frame. It shouldn't be impossible to decorate whole tree correctly. In case if we find cases which cannot be solved we can look into adding APIs to specify facets.