Backport Use CDN for .NET Assets to release 6.0

[TanayParikh]

#39007

[ghost]

Hi @TanayParikh. If this is not a tell-mode PR, please make sure to follow the instructions laid out in the servicing process document.
Otherwise, please add tell-mode label.

[TanayParikh]

@MattGal based on your comment, I believe 6.0 should be working here?

[dougbu]

To confirm: There's no CDN for the 6.0 bits❔

[MattGal]

To confirm: There's no CDN for the 6.0 bits❔

There are two storage accounts, dotnetcli and dotnetbuilds. Both have CDNs, but the container structure is different and this may be the source of confusion. I may have been incorrect about the inflection point because I saw 6.0* blobs on the dotnetbuilds account, but in general if you are going to use them at scale the CDN is the right choice.

e.g. https://dotnetbuilds.azureedge.net/public/Runtime/6.0.0-rtm.21522.10/dotnet-runtime-6.0.0-linux-arm.tar.gz doesn't exist, but https://dotnetcli.azureedge.net/dotnet/Runtime/6.0.0-rtm.21522.10/dotnet-runtime-6.0.0-linux-arm.tar.gz does and uses a CDN.

[ghost]

Hi @MattGal. It looks like you just commented on a closed PR. The team will most probably miss it. If you'd like to bring something important up to their attention, consider filing a new issue and add enough details to build context.

[TanayParikh]

@dotnet/aspnet-build requesting merge please.