-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 317
Fix | Build DataTypes table in code, add json data type
#3858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
edwardneal
wants to merge
7
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
edwardneal:fix/issue-3833-json
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+562
−751
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
de2b12e
Create structure of DataTypes static population
edwardneal 3414a47
Remove redundant data types from metadata
edwardneal 2f907ed
Populate DataTypes table from MetaType information
edwardneal cb37678
Add test to verify presence of data types
edwardneal 2ac0623
Add json data type to DataTypes schema collection
edwardneal 81aed9d
Use IsJsonSupported more widely
edwardneal 219824b
Plumb minimum version logic to AddStringOrBinaryType
edwardneal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
438 changes: 438 additions & 0 deletions
438
src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/src/Microsoft/Data/SqlClient/SqlMetaDataFactory.DataTypes.cs
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are there existing unit tests for this functionality that are now testing this new file? Or do we need new tests for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are existing unit tests which prove that the process of building the schema dataset completes successfully, and there's a new (somewhat basic) unit test which proves that we've not missed any types from the original XML file.
The data which we add in this new file shouldn't change (barring new data types) so I've not added an automatic test to verify it field-by-field, I just performed a manual one-off check of the resultant DataTypes table against the original XML file.