Skip to content

3.0 Software Development Plan #555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
Parent: Silk.NET 3.0 Proposals
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 3, 2021
Merged

3.0 Software Development Plan #555

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 3, 2021

Conversation

@Perksey
Copy link
Member

@Perksey Perksey commented Jul 28, 2021

This creates a roadmap and basic software development plan for 3.0, as well as a support & breaking change policy after the initial 3.0.

@Perksey Perksey changed the base branch from main to proposal/all-3.0-proposals July 28, 2021 20:50
@Perksey Perksey mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2021
Merged
5 tasks
@Perksey Perksey marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2021 21:00
@Perksey
Copy link
Member Author

Perksey commented Jul 28, 2021

I think this is ready for review (but I may have missed something!) I think we should save roadmap discussion for the Working Group meeting as I think it's better to discuss that in a voice format, but if you have any initial objections to anything else before the meeting let me know.

HurricanKai
HurricanKai reviewed Jul 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
documentation/proposals/Proposal - 3.0 & 3.X Software Development Plan.md
- We have solved this in the form of the proposal you are reading and all linked proposals: getting all the design done now and documented now, to prevent design debates later down the line. This should reduce friction when actually working on the library.
- We have been keeping the working group and key stakeholders in the loop with the 3.0 kickoff (again, see this proposal you are reading)
- The team are trying to communicate with eachother and figure out how to distribute work among themselves depending on individual circumstances and free time
- Codeowners have been established
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have they?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. ThomasMiz for input, you for Maths. We can have a more in-depth discussion on this to reiterate here prior to the meeting.

Perksey
Perksey commented Jul 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
documentation/proposals/Proposal - 3.0 & 3.X Software Development Plan.md
- We have solved this in the form of the proposal you are reading and all linked proposals: getting all the design done now and documented now, to prevent design debates later down the line. This should reduce friction when actually working on the library.
- We have been keeping the working group and key stakeholders in the loop with the 3.0 kickoff (again, see this proposal you are reading)
- The team are trying to communicate with eachother and figure out how to distribute work among themselves depending on individual circumstances and free time
- Codeowners have been established
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. ThomasMiz for input, you for Maths. We can have a more in-depth discussion on this to reiterate here prior to the meeting.

@Perksey
Copy link
Member Author

Perksey commented Jul 31, 2021

Can I get a follow-up on this and resolve discussions if you think they're fine?

@Perksey Perksey requested a review from HurricanKai July 31, 2021 20:10
HurricanKai
HurricanKai approved these changes Aug 3, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@HurricanKai HurricanKai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other then the code ownership question this is fine.

@Perksey
Copy link
Member Author

Perksey commented Aug 3, 2021

@ThomasMiz are you happy with this? Please approve on GitHub if you are.

@Perksey Perksey merged commit bb032e5 into proposal/all-3.0-proposals Aug 3, 2021
@Perksey Perksey deleted the proposal/sdp branch August 3, 2021 22:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@HurricanKai HurricanKai HurricanKai approved these changes

@ThomasMiz ThomasMiz ThomasMiz approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area-Meta proposal

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Perksey @HurricanKai @ThomasMiz