Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document scaffolding of many-to-many as a breaking change #3508

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 25, 2021

Conversation

ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

Fixes #3411

@ajcvickers ajcvickers requested a review from a team October 25, 2021 10:40
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ The following API and behavior changes have the potential to break existing appl
| [Nested optional dependents sharing a table and with no required properties cannot be saved](#nested-optionals) | High |
| [Changing the owner of an owned entity now throws an exception](#owned-reparenting) | Medium |
| [Cosmos: Related entity types are discovered as owned](#cosmos-owned) | Medium |
| [Many-to-many relationships without mapped join entities are now scaffolded](#many-to-many) | Medium |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that this is scaffolding-only, are we sure it warrants being a medium-grade change>?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would say yes, if you already have a scaffolded model with a simple many-to-many table

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your application won't compile and may need significant updates to make it compile. In my mind, it's more of a question between medium and high. But we'll see when the GA feedback starts to come in.

@ajcvickers ajcvickers force-pushed the PeterboroughScaffoldingLtd1025 branch from ff4d966 to 7951e75 Compare October 25, 2021 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document scaffolding of many-to-many as a breaking change
3 participants