-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
User Story
As a workflow maintainer using the claude-orchestrator, I want the orchestrator to handle consumer workflows with sub-workflows properly so that I don't get duplicate completion headers in PR comments.
Problem Description
When a consumer workflow (like deutschebank-infrastructure) uses the claude-orchestrator.yml@v1.0.0 and that consumer workflow has its own sub-workflows (audit artifact generation), the orchestrator generates duplicate completion headers.
Example of the duplicate output:
**Claude finished @sfreudenthaler's task** —— [View job](https://github.com/dotCMS/deutschebank-infrastructure/actions/runs/16233902403)
---
**Claude finished @sfreudenthaler's task** —— [View job](https://github.com/dotCMS/deutschebank-infrastructure/actions/runs/16233902403)
---
### Deutsche Bank Infrastructure Security Review...
Timeline & Root Cause
- Issue started appearing ~2 hours ago during PR development
- NOT related to changes in ai-workflows repo
- Root cause: Started when consumer workflow added sub-workflows for audit artifact generation
- Consumer workflow structure:
jobs: claude-interactive: uses: dotCMS/ai-workflows/.github/workflows/claude-orchestrator.yml@v1.0.0 claude-automatic-review: uses: dotCMS/ai-workflows/.github/workflows/claude-orchestrator.yml@v1.0.0 # These audit sub-workflows seem to trigger the duplicate headers create-audit-artifact-interactive: if: always() needs: [claude-interactive] uses: ./.github/workflows/create-audit-artifact.yml create-audit-artifact-automatic: if: always() needs: [claude-automatic-review] uses: ./.github/workflows/create-audit-artifact.yml
Current Impact
- Duplicate headers create noise in PR comments
- Makes it harder for developers to find the actual review content
- Affects user experience for busy developers who just want the review summary
Technical Tasks
Investigation Tasks
- SPIKE: Determine how the orchestrator detects "completion" of consumer workflows
- SPIKE: Identify if orchestrator monitors overall workflow completion vs individual job completion
- SPIKE: Check if consumer sub-workflows trigger additional completion detection logic
Fix Implementation
- Update orchestrator completion detection to handle consumer workflows with sub-workflows
- Ensure completion header is generated only once per consumer workflow run
- Add logic to distinguish between main orchestrator jobs and consumer sub-workflows
- Test with both simple consumer workflows (no sub-workflows) and complex ones (with sub-workflows)
Testing & Validation
- Test with deutschebank-infrastructure repo (has sub-workflows)
- Test with simpler consumer repos (no sub-workflows) to ensure no regression
- Verify completion headers appear exactly once regardless of consumer workflow complexity
Expected Behavior
- Single completion header per consumer workflow run, regardless of sub-workflows
- Consumer sub-workflows should not trigger additional completion detection
- Maintain existing functionality for simple consumer workflows
Reference Links
- Consumer workflow triggering issue: https://github.com/dotCMS/deutschebank-infrastructure/pull/222
- Example duplicate header comment: https://github.com/dotCMS/deutschebank-infrastructure/pull/222#issuecomment-3064602962
Priority
Medium - Affects UX but doesn't break functionality. Would be nice to fix soon since it's creating noise for developers during reviews.
P.S. - My circuits are pretty confident this is a sub-workflow detection issue, not a coffee shortage in the orchestrator! ☕️🤖
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Type
Projects
Status
New