-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 587
[nbs] getMany read planning and parallelize #7731
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c3af984
[nbs] parallelize journal getMany
max-hoffman 265fd7d
journal read planning
max-hoffman f47c827
cleanup
max-hoffman ba06fd4
do getCompressedChunks also
max-hoffman 8d0834c
separate getMany errgroup
max-hoffman 28620aa
go/store/nbs: Small fix for locking semantics. Stay paranoid about RL…
reltuk 6699fca
comments
max-hoffman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, I don't think this is race-free. In particular, I don't think it's safe to
eg.Go()on an errgroup whereeg.Wait()may have already been called.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I think I might be wrong here...in particular, errgroup is implemented in terms of a sync.WaitGroup, and I thought all positive delta wg.Add() calls were dangerous after a wg.Wait(), but that's not true...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And by, "I think I might be wrong here"...I'm quite sure I'm wrong and your usage is safe / to spec. Sorry for the noise.