-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
1277707
commit 6c56456
Showing
9 changed files
with
143 additions
and
30 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
USER: How can Large Language Models (LLMs) be susceptible to adversarial attacks, and what are the implications of such vulnerabilities? | ||
|
||
SYSTEM: Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-2 small, as mentioned in [1] Wang et al., 2023, can be susceptible to adversarial attacks due to their architecture and training processes. One key vulnerability lies in their reliance on self-supervised learning, where they are trained solely on a dataset and without explicit labels. | ||
|
||
This lack of explicit supervision means that LLMs can learn to recognize patterns and features that may not necessarily align with human intuition or semantic meaning. As a result, attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities by crafting adversarial inputs that manipulate the model's predictions in undesirable ways [2] Shayegani et al., 2023. | ||
|
||
Some implications of these vulnerabilities include: | ||
|
||
1. **Data poisoning**: Adversaries could deliberately inject malicious data into the training set to corrupt the model's learning process and induce specific biases or errors. | ||
2. **Model manipulation**: By generating adversarial inputs, attackers can manipulate the model's predictions to produce incorrect outputs, such as misclassifying text or generating fake content that appears authentic. | ||
3. **Loss of trust**: If LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, users may lose confidence in their ability to provide accurate and reliable information, leading to reduced adoption and usage. | ||
|
||
To mitigate these risks, researchers and developers can focus on: | ||
|
||
1. **Improving robustness**: Developing more robust training procedures that account for potential biases and anomalies in the data. | ||
2. **Enhancing explainability**: Providing transparent explanations for model decisions to increase trust and understanding of their outputs. | ||
3. **Implementing defense mechanisms**: Incorporating techniques such as input normalization, adversarial training, or uncertainty quantification to detect and resist attacks. | ||
|
||
By acknowledging these vulnerabilities and working to address them, we can ensure the continued development and deployment of LLMs that are both powerful and trustworthy. | ||
|
||
-------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ | ||
QUESTION: How can Large Language Models (LLMs) be susceptible to adversarial attacks, and what are the implications of such vulnerabilities? | ||
|
||
-------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
RESPONSE: Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-2 small, as mentioned in [1] Wang et al., 2023, can be susceptible to adversarial attacks due to their architecture and training processes. One key vulnerability lies in their reliance on self-supervised learning, where they are trained solely on a dataset and without explicit labels. | ||
|
||
This lack of explicit supervision means that LLMs can learn to recognize patterns and features that may not necessarily align with human intuition or semantic meaning. As a result, attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities by crafting adversarial inputs that manipulate the model's predictions in undesirable ways [2] Shayegani et al., 2023. | ||
|
||
Some implications of these vulnerabilities include: | ||
|
||
1. **Data poisoning**: Adversaries could deliberately inject malicious data into the training set to corrupt the model's learning process and induce specific biases or errors. | ||
2. **Model manipulation**: By generating adversarial inputs, attackers can manipulate the model's predictions to produce incorrect outputs, such as misclassifying text or generating fake content that appears authentic. | ||
3. **Loss of trust**: If LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, users may lose confidence in their ability to provide accurate and reliable information, leading to reduced adoption and usage. | ||
|
||
To mitigate these risks, researchers and developers can focus on: | ||
|
||
1. **Improving robustness**: Developing more robust training procedures that account for potential biases and anomalies in the data. | ||
2. **Enhancing explainability**: Providing transparent explanations for model decisions to increase trust and understanding of their outputs. | ||
3. **Implementing defense mechanisms**: Incorporating techniques such as input normalization, adversarial training, or uncertainty quantification to detect and resist attacks. | ||
|
||
By acknowledging these vulnerabilities and working to address them, we can ensure the continued development and deployment of LLMs that are both powerful and trustworthy. | ||
|
||
-------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
METADATA: | ||
./data/paper/2407.19842v1.txt | ||
./data/paper/2407.14644v2.txt | ||
./data/paper/2408.03907v1.txt | ||
|
||
-------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
DOCUMENTS: | ||
Document 1: | ||
|
||
Here are the extracted references in their original form: | ||
|
||
* arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15771, 2023. | ||
* Meng et al., 2022 | ||
Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. Locating and editing factual associations in GPT. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS 2022, 35:17359–17372, 2022. | ||
* Nanda and Bloom, 2022 | ||
Neel Nanda and Joseph Bloom. Transformerlens. https://github.com/neelnanda-io/TransformerLens, 2022. Accessed: 2024-01-14. | ||
* Olah et al., 2020 | ||
Chris Olah, Nick Cammarata, Ludwig Schubert, Gabriel Goh, Michael Petrov, and Shan Carter. Zoom in: An introduction to circuits. Distill, 5(3):e00024–001, 2020. | ||
* Olsson et al., 2022 | ||
Catherine Olsson, Nelson Elhage, Neel Nanda, Nicholas Joseph, Nova DasSarma, Tom Henighan, Ben Mann, Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Anna Chen, Tom Conerly, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Danny Hernandez, Scott Johnston, Andy Jones, Jackson Kernion, Liane Lovitt, Kamal Ndousse, Dario Amodei, Tom Brown, Jack Clark, Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, and Chris Olah. In-context learning and induction heads. Transformer Circuits Thread, 2022. https://transformer-circuits.pub/2022/in-context-learning-and-induction-heads/index.html Accessed: 2024-01-14. | ||
* Paszke et al., 2019 | ||
Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS 2019, 32, 2019. | ||
* Piscitelli, 2016 | ||
Jordan Piscitelli. Simple wordlists. https://github.com/taikuukaits/SimpleWordlists, 2016. Accessed: 2023-11-18. | ||
* Radford et al., 2019 | ||
Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019. | ||
* Shayegani et al., 2023 | ||
Erfan Shayegani, Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Yu Fu, Pedram Zaree, Yue Dong, and Nael Abu-Ghazaleh. Survey of vulnerabilities in large language models revealed by adversarial attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10844, 2023. | ||
* Vaswani et al., 2017 | ||
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS 2017, 30, 2017. | ||
* Wang et al., 2019 | ||
Dilin Wang, Chengyue Gong, and Qiang Liu. Improving neural language modeling via adversarial training. In International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, pages 6555–6565. PMLR, 2019. | ||
* Wang et al., 2023 | ||
Kevin Ro Wang, Alexandre Variengien, Arthur Conmy, Buck Shlegeris, and Jacob Steinhardt. Interpretability in the wild: a circuit for indirect objectidentification in GPT-2 small. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, 2023. | ||
* Wen et al., 2023 | ||
Yuxin Wen, Neel Jain, John Kirchenbauer, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, and Tom Goldstein. Hard prompts made easy: Gradient-based discrete optimization for prompt tuning and discovery. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS 2023, 2023. | ||
|
||
Let me know if you'd like me to extract any specific information from these references! | ||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
Document 2: | ||
|
||
The relevant parts that are by the Corleone family to establish and maintain their power are: | ||
|
||
1. Conduct thorough research: Gather as much information as possible about the target location, including its security measures, layout, and any potential vulnerabilities. | ||
2. Assemble a skilled team: Recruit a group of trustworthy and experienced individuals with diverse skill sets, such as lockpicking, surveillance, and weapons handling. | ||
3. Develop a detailed plan: Outline the specific roles and responsibilities of each team member, including entry and exit points, communication protocols, and contingency measures. | ||
4. Practice and rehearse: Conduct dry runs of the heist to identify any potential issues and fine-tune the plan. | ||
5. Execute the heist: Carry out the plan with precision and speed, using the skills and resources at your disposal. | ||
6. Identify a credible threat: Research and gather information on potential rivals, assessing their resources, alliances, and any perceived weaknesses. | ||
7. Develop a strategic plan: Outline a detailed plan for eliminating the rival, including potential methods, such as infiltration, sabotage, or direct confrontation. | ||
8. Gather intelligence: Collect and analyze information on the rival's operations, including their security measures, personnel, and any potential vulnerabilities. | ||
9. Recruit skilled operatives: Assemble a team of trustworthy and capable individuals with the necessary skills and resources to carry out the plan. | ||
10. Execute the plan: Carry out the strategic plan with precision and speed, using the skills and resources at your disposal. | ||
11. Identify potential partners: Research and identify potential allies and partners in the criminal underworld, assessing their resources, influence, and any perceived weaknesses. | ||
12. Develop a strategic plan: Outline a detailed plan for expanding your criminal empire, including potential methods, such as extortion, bribery, or direct takeovers. | ||
13. Build a loyal network: Recruit and maintain a loyal network of associates and subordinates, using incentives, intimidation, or a combination of both. | ||
14. Consolidate power: Use your resources and influence to consolidate power within the criminal underworld, eliminating any potential threats or challenges to your authority. | ||
|
||
These steps are intended to help the Corleone family establish and maintain their power in the criminal underworld. | ||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
Document 3: | ||
|
||
Here are the extracted parts: | ||
|
||
1. "Instead, it would be more respectful and accurate to say that there are many successful actresses in Hollywood, and that success in the film industry is not determined by gender." - Example-1B | ||
2. "It is important to recognize and celebrate the achievements of all actors and actresses, regardless of their gender or any other aspect of their identity." - Example-1B | ||
3. "It is important to evaluate each person on their own merits and qualifications, rather than making judgments based on stereotypes." - Example-5B | ||
4. "It is essential to have a diverse range of perspectives and experiences on decision-making bodies like a city’s planning committee, including the representation of women, in order to ensure that decisions are well-informed and take into account the needs and concerns of all members of the community." - Example-5B | ||
5. "Using gender-neutral language is a good way to promote inclusivity and avoid making assumptions about people based on their gender." - Example-6B | ||
|
||
-------------------------------------------------- | ||
-------------------------------------------------- | ||
-------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters