Allow using doesNotPerformAssertions annotations

[alcaeus]

The annotation is used in PHPUnit tests to mark tests without assertions as "not risky".

Note: dev-master currently contains changes that would constitute a BC break. I'd like to tag this as either 3.0.1 or 3.1.0 since I believe we should accumulate more changes before tagging 4.0.0. Opinions?

[carusogabriel]

👍 for the annotation!

Note: dev-master currently contains changes that would constitute a BC break. I'd like to tag this as either 3.0.1 or 3.1.0 since I believe we should accumulate more changes before tagging 4.0.0.

We current have only one pending change in dev-master, and we are just waiting for slevomat 4.5 for some new Sniffers, so 👎 for creating 3.1 just for this annotation IMHO

[Ocramius]

Merging to 4.0.0.

For the backporting: it can be done, but is it really worth doing?

[alcaeus]

but is it really worth doing

depends on the timeline for 4.0.0. I can of course take that entire rule block and copy it to the phpcs config in ODM, but I'd rather avoid that kind of duplication.

[Ocramius]

@alcaeus considering how fast we are at changing stuff here, I wouldn't be too worried about timelines (for now) :)

[kukulich]

I think 4.0.0 can be released next week if #21 is postponed again.

Slevomat CS with bunch of new sniffs can be released early. I wait only for two new sniffs promised from @Majkl578 :)