-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/organization members #534
Conversation
edf9d34
to
c225e13
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #534 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 62.4% 62.16% -0.24%
===========================================
Files 218 221 +3
Lines 6556 6655 +99
Branches 652 661 +9
===========================================
+ Hits 4091 4137 +46
- Misses 2307 2360 +53
Partials 158 158
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
* | ||
* @param {OrganisationUser[]} organizationUsers The latest array of organization users | ||
* @memberof OrganizationMembersService | ||
*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the method have the @transaction()
annotation, given all the store interactions that are happening?
Preliminary organization members CRUD