Add checks for capabilities that allows container escape #476
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the PR @nikitastupin! Looks good, will merge after a few tests. |
|
So sorry @nikitastupin for the delay, thank you for your contribution. |
|
Hi @konstruktoid, no worries! I'm glad that you've found this PR helpful and merged it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi team,
The
check_5_3lists extra capabilities but unfortunately it doesn't describes the risks associated with them. I decided to fill this gap and added checks for capabilities that allow container escape directly.Nikita Stupin
Advanced Software Technology Lab
Huawei