Feat/#1 test coderabbit

[dmp100]

Related issue

• closed [FEAT] coderabbit  #1

Work Description

• Add Comments to App.kt for Coderabbit test

Screenshot

둘이 싸워라

Uncompleted Tasks

• GithubAction Setting for web

Reference

• 혼자 프로젝트 할 때 외롭지 않으세요? 그러면 AI 기반 Code reviewer인 "CodeRabbit" 을 사용해보세요!
• CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Internal code maintenance with no impact to end-user functionality or features.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

A test comment "// Test Coderabbit22" was added above the App Composable function in the main application file. No functional changes, control flow modifications, or public declarations were altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Test Comment Addition composeApp/src/commonMain/kotlin/org/patchnote/patchnote/App.kt	Added single-line test comment above App Composable function; no behavioral changes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

• Single comment addition with no logic impact or side effects

Poem

🐰 A comment hops in, so small and so light,
Test Coderabbit marks the code review's might,
No logic was changed, just a note for the team,
Simple and swift—as fleeting as a dream! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Linked Issues check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR adds a test comment to App.kt, but issue #1 states the objective is 'adding coderabbits for code reviews' with unclear technical requirements.	Clarify in issue #1 what 'adding coderabbits for code reviews' means technically and whether this PR properly implements the intended feature.

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Feat/#1 test coderabbit' directly relates to the PR's main change: adding test comments to App.kt for Coderabbit testing, as described in the linked issue #1.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The PR only adds a single-line test comment to App.kt, which is directly related to the stated objective of testing Coderabbit functionality.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/#1-test-Coderabbit

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds a test comment to the App.kt file and introduces a standardized pull request template for the repository. The changes are minimal and primarily for testing the CodeRabbit integration.

Key changes:

• Added a test comment in the main App composable function
• Created a new PR template to standardize future pull request descriptions

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
composeApp/src/commonMain/kotlin/org/patchnote/patchnote/App.kt	Added a test comment for CodeRabbit integration testing
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md	Created a new PR template with sections for issue tracking, work description, screenshots, tasks, and references

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

The tool name should be capitalized as "CodeRabbit" (with capital 'R') rather than "Coderabbit".

Suggested change

	// Test Coderabbit
	// Test CodeRabbit

[coderabbitai]

Note

Docstrings generation - SUCCESS
Generated docstrings for this pull request at #3