Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix issue 16420 - Incorrect example in std.getopt docs #4745

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 23, 2016

Conversation

aG0aep6G
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix Bugzilla Description
16420 Incorrect example in std.getopt docs

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@aG0aep6G, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @andralex, @burner and @AndrejMitrovic to be potential reviewers. @andralex: The PR was automatically assigned to you, please reassign it if you were identified mistakenly.

(The DLang Bot is under development. If you experience any issues, please open an issue at its repo.)

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member

LGTM - Thanks for fixing :)

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 88.78% (diff: 100%)

Merging #4745 into master will not change coverage

@@             master      #4745   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           121        121          
  Lines         74159      74159          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
  Hits          65845      65845          
  Misses         8314       8314          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 0538d0c...2be9e31

@burner
Copy link
Member

burner commented Aug 23, 2016

Auto-merge toggled on

@burner burner merged commit b2b9e87 into dlang:master Aug 23, 2016
@aG0aep6G aG0aep6G deleted the 16420 branch August 25, 2016 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants