make linters happy #119
Merged
make linters happy #119
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
December 20, 2016 16:00
mauricio
reviewed
Dec 22, 2016
| } | ||
| // type regionRoot struct { // DEADCODE | ||
| // Region *Region | ||
| // } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you just delete this?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Running linters on the package comes back with a number of stylistic errors relating to commenting, some cyclic complexity, opportunities for the use of an interface, and some shadowed/ineffectual/downright missing error checks. I fixed them so the Go report card looks clean(er). Tests run still,