identity provider id awareness for party and user management apis through ledger client #16632
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ough ledger client
mziolekda
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2023
garyverhaegen-da
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2023
…ough ledger client (#16632) * identity provider id awareness for party and user management apis through ledger client * none case for ObjectMetadata translation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The ledger client party and user management apis currently don't allow you to specify a non-default identityProviderId
Add pass through params so you can specify this and it is not defaulted to
""in all cases.Also implement the
updatePartymethod, and partially deal with ObjectMetadata serialisation and deserialisation. (still more work to do to fully pass through ObjectMetadata in all cases)