-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Move resampler out of parsers, remove relative paths for import #163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #163 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.17% 99.17%
=======================================
Files 7 7
Lines 242 243 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 240 241 +1
Misses 2 2
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this has gone a bit wrong again. Let's close this and try again.
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ | |||
import numpy | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def loadData(filename, minrows=10, headers=False, hdel="=", hignore=None, **kwargs): | |||
def load_data(filename, minrows=10, headers=False, hdel="=", hignore=None, **kwargs): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we do not want this change (please see the discussion on #163 ). Please revert.
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ | |||
) | |||
|
|||
|
|||
class Diffraction_object: | |||
class DiffractionObject: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we want this change, but we want to do it as a deprecation. Please see the discussion on #163
@sbillinge I've reverted those and now the only changes is the resampler path and removing the relative path imports in parsers |
@alisnwu I will close this. I was expecting you to do it this way, but we don't want the committee and the reverts in the history. Sorry for the wasted work of reverting commits |
closes #138
All discussions made in #158
@sbillinge Ready for review