-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
static_analysist now passes function identifiers to transform() #3130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
kroening
commented
Oct 9, 2018
- Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
- My contribution is formatted in line with CODING_STANDARD.md.
- Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
- Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
- My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
- My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
- White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 21b17c3).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/87406378
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would be nice to keep the single-function entry point; otherwise lgtm
src/analyses/static_analysis.cpp
Outdated
@@ -65,14 +65,6 @@ void static_analysis_baset::operator()( | |||
fixedpoint(goto_functions); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
void static_analysis_baset::operator()( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're using this one -- take an identifier rather than removing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
21b17c3
to
d8bb574
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: d8bb574).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/87472628
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As with #3132 : why is changing the API worth doing?