Skip to content

static_analysist now passes function identifiers to transform() #3130

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2018

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

@kroening kroening commented Oct 9, 2018

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • My contribution is formatted in line with CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 21b17c3).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/87406378

Copy link
Contributor

@smowton smowton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would be nice to keep the single-function entry point; otherwise lgtm

@@ -65,14 +65,6 @@ void static_analysis_baset::operator()(
fixedpoint(goto_functions);
}

void static_analysis_baset::operator()(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're using this one -- take an identifier rather than removing?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@kroening kroening force-pushed the static-analysis-function branch from 21b17c3 to d8bb574 Compare October 10, 2018 11:06
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: d8bb574).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/87472628

Copy link
Collaborator

@martin-cs martin-cs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As with #3132 : why is changing the API worth doing?

@kroening kroening merged commit be53e82 into develop Oct 10, 2018
@kroening kroening deleted the static-analysis-function branch October 10, 2018 22:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants