Implements Accounts Controllers Validators #125
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
I've updated |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've completely removed
RequiredFieldsValidator,CompareFieldsValidatorandValidatorCompositoras proposed on issue #72, and implemented the validators by controller using yup library, as suggested.I had some issues because
package.jsonandyarn.lockfiles conflicted due the long time of the fork, some libraries have updated... but is already solved.The error messages adapter is already created, but it's under development and isn't been applied yet, but the validators themselves are working very well.
If approved, I'll keep implementing the others validators following the same pattern.