Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix custom normalization #2464

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Gabriella439
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #2463

The root of the problem was that normalizeWithM would only apply the custom normalizer to function applications, instead of testing the custom normalizer on all subexpressions.

Fixes #2463

The root of the problem was that `normalizeWithM` would only
apply the custom normalizer to function applications, instead of
testing the custom normalizer on all subexpressions.
@Gabriella439 Gabriella439 merged commit e1645f1 into master Oct 15, 2022
@Gabriella439 Gabriella439 deleted the gabriella/fix_custom_normalizer branch October 15, 2022 16:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Having trouble creating an extension that produces union values
1 participant