Skip to content

Add benchmark results of Intel 13700K custom hardware #402

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

awesometic
Copy link
Contributor

@awesometic awesometic commented Mar 12, 2023

스크린샷 2023-03-12 오후 5 44 31

This result is quite a new one for this table, right? 😄
I was shocked that the 13700K is similar to the M1 Ultra 20-core in Xcode build performance.

By the way, the hardware model shows the wrong one, I'm using PCIe 3.0 NVMe 1TB for the macOS drive.
It shows my shared data storage of multiple operating systems.

Checklist

If you have any non-Apple hardware components - submit your results to the Custom Hardware table.

  • I performed all steps to correctly run XcodeBenchmark.
  • I used Xcode 12.5 or above.
  • I attached a screenshot with a compilation time and other fields, example.
  • I confirm that Time column is still sorted.
  • The content in cells is centered.

Signed-off-by: Deokgyu Yang <secugyu@gmail.com>
@gx28ga
Copy link

gx28ga commented Mar 24, 2023

Wow, that's quite impressive! What's the specs of your PC builds?

@awesometic
Copy link
Contributor Author

CPU: Intel i7 13700K
CPU Cooler: Deepcool LS720
M/B: Gigabyte B760M Aorus Elite
RAM: Samsung DDR5 32GB 4800MHz * 2 with RAM cooler
SSD: RevuAhn NX2300 1TB
PSU: Antec EAG PRO 750W 80PLUS GOLD Modular

Pretty impressive results for me too :)

@wizcheu
Copy link

wizcheu commented Jun 13, 2023

Run again and I get a better result.
image

@devMEremenko devMEremenko merged commit 5c5800f into devMEremenko:master Jul 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants