Form Prefill - config and yml changes to support FE form structure #4374
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
va-vfs-bot
temporarily deployed
to
dd-9222_fix_prefill_data_nesting_for_686/master
digitaldrk
changed the title
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of change
This is a small adjustment to the prefill data structure associated with the 686c form. As that task evolves, so does the structure of the data.
Original issue(s)
https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/vft-59c95ae5fda7577a9b3184f8/issues/department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team/9222
Things to know about this PR
686c BE code is not quite ready. This just prefill data to help the veteran by populating info we already know about them.
From what I understand, there is no way to manually test if data is populating properly w/o going to staging,
I've asked the engineer who initially implemented this to verify that's the case.Previous engineer responded. They relied on specs.No
No
Testing
Associated tests have been updated and are passing.