-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Unused Settings - Part 1 #19096
Conversation
@@ -86,12 +86,10 @@ sign_in: | |||
|
|||
terms_of_use: | |||
current_version: v1 | |||
provisioner_cookie_domain: localhost |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Riley added this last year in #14455. @rileyanderson, we don't see Settings.terms_of_use.provisioner_cookie_domain
called anywhere. I just wanted to check with you before we deleted this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Talked to Riley and provisioner_cookie_domain
isn't being used
Seems good to me. I asked for Riley's review because that key is relatively new compared to the others you're removing. Are any of these values in the manifest repo? |
@mathisto could you take a look at this PR regarding the updates to appeals_api specs (or anything else if you see something) |
@@ -35,11 +35,9 @@ | |||
let(:upload) { create(:higher_level_review_v1, status: 'received') } | |||
|
|||
it 'ignores them' do | |||
with_settings(Settings.modules_appeals_api, higher_level_review_updater_enabled: true) do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe that unlike the subsequent files, this batch version's Settings
will need to be replaced with the relevant Flipper flag.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mathisto are you saying you would like me to leave with_settings...
in the spec?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mathisto Can you be more specific about what changes you want here?
Backend-review-group approval confirmed. |
Summary
This is part 1 of 3-ish
config/settings.yml
andconfig/settings/test.yml
[]
,.dig
,fetch
)Related issue(s)
Testing done
Acceptance criteria
config/settings
files