Add problem matchers for deno lint
#62
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r7kamura
commented
May 30, 2024
| "owner": "deno-lint", | ||
| "pattern": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "regexp": "^(?:\\x1B\\[[0-9;]*[a-zA-Z])*(warning|warn|error)(?:\\[(\\S*)\\])?(?:\\x1B\\[[0-9;]*[a-zA-Z])*: (.*?)(?:\\x1B\\[[0-9;]*[a-zA-Z])*$", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(warning|warn|error)
I know that there is at least an error in the severity of deno lint, but I am not exactly sure what other severities exist. If anyone has exact information, please let me know.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to:
I did not add a matcher for
deno fmt --checkthis time, because I thought its output lacked tinformation to be used by problem matchers and could not be handled well.I have tried this feature on my own sample project and confirmed that it works well like this:
The real example is here: