-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(ops): Adding op2 macro and implementing in a couple of places #19534
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aapoalas
reviewed
Jun 16, 2023
mmastrac
changed the title
WIP: Refactor op signature parsing
refactor(ops): Adding op2 macro as a new, more maintainable op system
Jun 22, 2023
mmastrac
changed the title
refactor(ops): Adding op2 macro as a new, more maintainable op system
refactor(ops): Adding op2 macro and implementing in a couple of places
Jun 22, 2023
bartlomieju
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2023
…19566) `ZeroCopyBuf` was convenient to use, but sometimes it did hide details that some copies were necessary in certain cases. Also it made it way to easy for the caller to pass around and convert into different values. This commit splits `ZeroCopyBuf` into `JsBuffer` (an array buffer coming from V8) and `ToJsBuffer` (a Rust buffer that will be converted into a V8 array buffer). As a result some magical conversions were removed (they were never used) limiting the API surface and preparing for changes in #19534.
bartlomieju
reviewed
Jun 22, 2023
bartlomieju
reviewed
Jun 24, 2023
bartlomieju
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
hardfist
pushed a commit
to hardfist/deno
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2024
…enoland#19566) `ZeroCopyBuf` was convenient to use, but sometimes it did hide details that some copies were necessary in certain cases. Also it made it way to easy for the caller to pass around and convert into different values. This commit splits `ZeroCopyBuf` into `JsBuffer` (an array buffer coming from V8) and `ToJsBuffer` (a Rust buffer that will be converted into a V8 array buffer). As a result some magical conversions were removed (they were never used) limiting the API surface and preparing for changes in denoland#19534.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a new op system that will eventually replace
#[op]
.Features
fast
labelling for fast ops, allowing for visual scanning of fast ops#[string]
,#[serde]
and#[smi]
parameters.This first version of op2 supports integer and Option parameters only, and allows us to start working on converting ops and adding features.