Repository navigation
Business rules over attribute facts join the roadmap - #278
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Wayland Yang <wayland0916@gmail.com>
This was referenced Sep 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds one roadmap line in both READMEs for #277: rules written by people over an entity's attribute facts (a threshold, a category set) that classify it as a derived fact, with the rule and the premises as the explanation. Prompted by a mud-logging workflow described on X: a well counts as gas-bearing when total hydrocarbon clears a threshold and the interpretation category is a gas anomaly. Today the inputs can be captured but the rule has nowhere to live; the issue has the shape.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code