Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[spark] Add docker_publish action #2431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

xyang16
Copy link
Contributor

@xyang16 xyang16 commented Feb 27, 2023

Description

Brief description of what this PR is about

Add docker_publish action

@xyang16 xyang16 requested review from zachgk, frankfliu and a team as code owners February 27, 2023 22:49
@xyang16 xyang16 requested a review from lanking520 February 27, 2023 22:50
if: github.repository == 'deepjavalibrary/djl'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
env:
DOCKER_REGISTRY: deepjavalibrary
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need these two env var? maybe just hard code in the command is more clear

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK

- name: Configure AWS Credentials
uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v1-node16
with:
aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we publish to dockerhub instead? Why using a custom ECR repo?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is for reading the base EMR image

@KexinFeng KexinFeng merged commit bf1d037 into deepjavalibrary:master Mar 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants