Skip to content

[v0.4.0] Task Resumption Research Spike #46

@dean0x

Description

@dean0x

Task Resumption Research Spike

Version: v0.4.0
Priority: High
Complexity: Research (unknown feasibility)
Timeline: 1-2 weeks
Dependencies: None
Blocks: Task Resumption full implementation

Problem Statement

Before implementing Task Resumption, we need to validate whether Claude API/CLI supports session continuation. The implementation approach depends on this research:

  • Full resumption: Restore complete conversation context (requires API support)
  • Context injection: Inject summary of previous attempt into new session (fallback)
  • Not feasible: Document limitations and defer feature

Research Questions

Q1: Claude API Session Continuation

  • Does Claude API support resuming from a conversation ID?
  • Can conversation history be serialized and restored?
  • Is there a --continue or --session-id flag in Claude CLI?

Q2: Conversation State

  • What format is conversation history stored in?
  • Can tool call history be replayed?
  • What are token limits for restored conversations?

Q3: Context Injection Fallback

  • If full resumption isn't possible, can we inject context?
  • What format works best? ("Previous attempt failed at step X...")
  • How much context can we inject before hitting limits?

Q4: Checkpoint Overhead

  • How long does checkpoint serialization take?
  • What's the storage size per checkpoint?
  • Can checkpoints be created asynchronously?

Deliverables

1. Technical Feasibility Document

Location: docs/research/TASK-RESUMPTION-FEASIBILITY.md

Contents:

  • Claude API capabilities discovered
  • Session continuation support (yes/no/partial)
  • Context injection viability
  • Recommended implementation approach
  • Risk assessment

2. Proof of Concept Code

  • PoC A: Full session continuation (if supported)
  • PoC B: Context injection fallback
  • Test coverage for basic scenarios

3. Go/No-Go Decision

Outcome Action
Full resumption viable Proceed with full implementation (3-4 weeks)
Context injection viable Proceed with fallback implementation (1 week)
Neither viable Document limitations, defer to v0.5.0+

Acceptance Criteria

  • Feasibility document produced with clear findings
  • At least one PoC demonstrates working approach
  • Go/no-go decision documented with justification
  • Implementation estimate provided for chosen approach
  • Risks and mitigations documented

Research Scope

In Scope

  • Claude API/CLI documentation review
  • Prototype code for session continuation
  • Prototype code for context injection
  • Performance benchmarking of checkpoints

Out of Scope

  • Full implementation (blocked by this spike)
  • Production-ready code
  • Database schema implementation
  • MCP tool implementation

Success Criteria

  • Clear recommendation on implementation approach
  • Working prototype demonstrating feasibility
  • Documented decision with technical justification

Created via /specify command

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions