Skip to content

Sdev priv replace #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Sdev priv replace #3

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

IulianOlaru249
Copy link

sof/imx/imx8.c: Replace sdev->private with sdev->pdata->hw_pdata for correct usage.

@IulianOlaru249 IulianOlaru249 deleted the sdev_priv_replace branch July 22, 2020 09:48
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
Currently, if a bpf program has more than one subprograms, each program will be
jitted separately. For programs with bpf-to-bpf calls the
prog->aux->num_exentries is not setup properly. For example, with
bpf_iter_netlink.c modified to force one function to be not inlined and with
CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON the following error is seen:
   $ ./test_progs -n 3/3
   ...
   libbpf: failed to load program 'iter/netlink'
   libbpf: failed to load object 'bpf_iter_netlink'
   libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'bpf_iter_netlink': -4007
   test_netlink:FAIL:bpf_iter_netlink__open_and_load skeleton open_and_load failed
   #3/3 netlink:FAIL
The dmesg shows the following errors:
   ex gen bug
which is triggered by the following code in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:
   if (excnt >= bpf_prog->aux->num_exentries) {
     pr_err("ex gen bug\n");
     return -EFAULT;
   }

This patch fixes the issue by computing proper num_exentries for each
subprogram before calling JIT.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
devm_gpiod_get_index() doesn't return NULL but -ENOENT when the
requested GPIO doesn't exist,  leading to the following messages:

[    2.742468] gpiod_direction_input: invalid GPIO (errorpointer)
[    2.748147] can't set direction for gpio #2: -2
[    2.753081] gpiod_direction_input: invalid GPIO (errorpointer)
[    2.758724] can't set direction for gpio #3: -2
[    2.763666] gpiod_direction_output: invalid GPIO (errorpointer)
[    2.769394] can't set direction for gpio #4: -2
[    2.774341] gpiod_direction_input: invalid GPIO (errorpointer)
[    2.779981] can't set direction for gpio #5: -2
[    2.784545] ff000a20.serial: ttyCPM1 at MMIO 0xfff00a20 (irq = 39, base_baud = 8250000) is a CPM UART

Use devm_gpiod_get_index_optional() instead.

At the same time, handle the error case and properly exit
with an error.

Fixes: 97cbaf2 ("tty: serial: cpm_uart: Convert to use GPIO descriptors")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/694a25fdce548c5ee8b060ef6a4b02746b8f25c0.1591986307.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
Jakub Sitnicki says:

====================
This patch set prepares ground for link-based multi-prog attachment for
future netns attach types, with BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach type in mind [0].

Two changes are needed in order to attach and run a series of BPF programs:

  1) an bpf_prog_array of programs to run (patch #2), and
  2) a list of attached links to keep track of attachments (patch #3).

Nothing changes for BPF flow_dissector. Just as before only one program can
be attached to netns.

In v3 I've simplified patch #2 that introduces bpf_prog_array to take
advantage of the fact that it will hold at most one program for now.

In particular, I'm no longer using bpf_prog_array_copy. It turned out to be
less suitable for link operations than I thought as it fails to append the
same BPF program.

bpf_prog_array_replace_item is also gone, because we know we always want to
replace the first element in prog_array.

Naturally the code that handles bpf_prog_array will need change once
more when there is a program type that allows multi-prog attachment. But I
feel it will be better to do it gradually and present it together with
tests that actually exercise multi-prog code paths.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200511185218.1422406-1-jakub@cloudflare.com/

v2 -> v3:
- Don't check if run_array is null in link update callback. (Martin)
- Allow updating the link with the same BPF program. (Andrii)
- Add patch #4 with a test for the above case.
- Kill bpf_prog_array_replace_item. Access the run_array directly.
- Switch from bpf_prog_array_copy() to bpf_prog_array_alloc(1, ...).
- Replace rcu_deref_protected & RCU_INIT_POINTER with rcu_replace_pointer.
- Drop Andrii's Ack from patch #2. Code changed.

v1 -> v2:

- Show with a (void) cast that bpf_prog_array_replace_item() return value
  is ignored on purpose. (Andrii)
- Explain why bpf-cgroup cannot replace programs in bpf_prog_array based
  on bpf_prog pointer comparison in patch #2 description. (Andrii)
====================

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
…kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into kvm-master

KVM/arm fixes for 5.8, take #3

- Disable preemption on context-switching PMU EL0 state happening
  on system register trap
- Don't clobber X0 when tearing down KVM via a soft reset (kexec)
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
The vfio_pci_release call will free and clear the error and request
eventfd ctx while these ctx could be in use at the same time in the
function like vfio_pci_request, and it's expected to protect them under
the vdev->igate mutex, which is missing in vfio_pci_release.

This issue is introduced since commit 1518ac2 ("vfio/pci: fix memory
leaks of eventfd ctx"),and since commit 5c5866c ("vfio/pci: Clear
error and request eventfd ctx after releasing"), it's very easily to
trigger the kernel panic like this:

[ 9513.904346] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
[ 9513.913091] Mem abort info:
[ 9513.915871]   ESR = 0x96000006
[ 9513.918912]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 9513.924198]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 9513.927238]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 9513.930364] Data abort info:
[ 9513.933231]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006
[ 9513.937048]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
[ 9513.940003] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000007ec7d12000
[ 9513.946414] [0000000000000008] pgd=0000007ec7d13003, p4d=0000007ec7d13003, pud=0000007ec728c003, pmd=0000000000000000
[ 9513.956975] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 9513.962521] Modules linked in: vfio_pci vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio hclge hns3 hnae3 [last unloaded: vfio_pci]
[ 9513.972998] CPU: 4 PID: 1327 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.8.0-rc4+ #3
[ 9513.980443] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V3.B270.01 05/08/2020
[ 9513.989274] pstate: 80400089 (Nzcv daIf +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
[ 9513.994827] pc : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x88
[ 9513.999515] lr : eventfd_signal+0x6c/0x1b0
[ 9514.003591] sp : ffff800038a0b960
[ 9514.006889] x29: ffff800038a0b960 x28: ffff007ef7f4da10
[ 9514.012175] x27: ffff207eefbbfc80 x26: ffffbb7903457000
[ 9514.017462] x25: ffffbb7912191000 x24: ffff007ef7f4d400
[ 9514.022747] x23: ffff20be6e0e4c00 x22: 0000000000000008
[ 9514.028033] x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000
[ 9514.033321] x19: 0000000000000008 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 9514.038606] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffbb7910029328
[ 9514.043893] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000001
[ 9514.049179] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000002
[ 9514.054466] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000a00
[ 9514.059752] x9 : ffff800038a0b840 x8 : ffff007ef7f4de60
[ 9514.065038] x7 : ffff007fffc96690 x6 : fffffe01faffb748
[ 9514.070324] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
[ 9514.075609] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000001
[ 9514.080895] x1 : ffff007ef7f4d400 x0 : 0000000000000000
[ 9514.086181] Call trace:
[ 9514.088618]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x88
[ 9514.092954]  eventfd_signal+0x6c/0x1b0
[ 9514.096691]  vfio_pci_request+0x84/0xd0 [vfio_pci]
[ 9514.101464]  vfio_del_group_dev+0x150/0x290 [vfio]
[ 9514.106234]  vfio_pci_remove+0x30/0x128 [vfio_pci]
[ 9514.111007]  pci_device_remove+0x48/0x108
[ 9514.115001]  device_release_driver_internal+0x100/0x1b8
[ 9514.120200]  device_release_driver+0x28/0x38
[ 9514.124452]  pci_stop_bus_device+0x68/0xa8
[ 9514.128528]  pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x20/0x38
[ 9514.133557]  pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0xb4/0x128
[ 9514.137893]  sriov_disable+0x3c/0x108
[ 9514.141538]  pci_disable_sriov+0x28/0x38
[ 9514.145445]  hns3_pci_sriov_configure+0x48/0xb8 [hns3]
[ 9514.150558]  sriov_numvfs_store+0x110/0x198
[ 9514.154724]  dev_attr_store+0x44/0x60
[ 9514.158373]  sysfs_kf_write+0x5c/0x78
[ 9514.162018]  kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x210
[ 9514.166010]  __vfs_write+0x48/0x90
[ 9514.169395]  vfs_write+0xbc/0x1c0
[ 9514.172694]  ksys_write+0x74/0x100
[ 9514.176079]  __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30
[ 9514.179987]  el0_svc_common.constprop.4+0x110/0x200
[ 9514.184842]  do_el0_svc+0x34/0x98
[ 9514.188144]  el0_svc+0x14/0x40
[ 9514.191185]  el0_sync_handler+0xb0/0x2d0
[ 9514.195088]  el0_sync+0x140/0x180
[ 9514.198389] Code: b9001020 d2800000 52800022 f9800271 (885ffe61)
[ 9514.204455] ---[ end trace 648de00c8406465f ]---
[ 9514.212308] note: bash[1327] exited with preempt_count 1

Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1518ac2 ("vfio/pci: fix memory leaks of eventfd ctx")
Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
The `INSN_CONFIG` comedi instruction with sub-instruction code
`INSN_CONFIG_DIGITAL_TRIG` includes a base channel in `data[3]`. This is
used as a right shift amount for other bitmask values without being
checked.  Shift amounts greater than or equal to 32 will result in
undefined behavior.  Add code to deal with this.

Fixes: 33cdce6 ("staging: comedi: addi_apci_1032: conform to new INSN_CONFIG_DIGITAL_TRIG")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.8+
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200717145257.112660-3-abbotti@mev.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
The `INSN_CONFIG` comedi instruction with sub-instruction code
`INSN_CONFIG_DIGITAL_TRIG` includes a base channel in `data[3]`. This is
used as a right shift amount for other bitmask values without being
checked.  Shift amounts greater than or equal to 32 will result in
undefined behavior.  Add code to deal with this.

Fixes: 1e15687 ("staging: comedi: addi_apci_1564: add Change-of-State interrupt subdevice and required functions")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.17+
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200717145257.112660-4-abbotti@mev.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
Stalls are quite frequent with recent kernels. I enabled
CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR and I caught the following stall:

watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [cc1:22803]
CPU: 0 PID: 22803 Comm: cc1 Not tainted 5.6.17+ #3
Hardware name: 9000/800/rp3440
 IAOQ[0]: d_alloc_parallel+0x384/0x688
 IAOQ[1]: d_alloc_parallel+0x388/0x688
 RP(r2): d_alloc_parallel+0x134/0x688
Backtrace:
 [<000000004036974c>] __lookup_slow+0xa4/0x200
 [<0000000040369fc8>] walk_component+0x288/0x458
 [<000000004036a9a0>] path_lookupat+0x88/0x198
 [<000000004036e748>] filename_lookup+0xa0/0x168
 [<000000004036e95c>] user_path_at_empty+0x64/0x80
 [<000000004035d93c>] vfs_statx+0x104/0x158
 [<000000004035dfcc>] __do_sys_lstat64+0x44/0x80
 [<000000004035e5a0>] sys_lstat64+0x20/0x38
 [<0000000040180054>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x14

The code was stuck in this loop in d_alloc_parallel:

    4037d414:   0e 00 10 dc     ldd 0(r16),ret0
    4037d418:   c7 fc 5f ed     bb,< ret0,1f,4037d414 <d_alloc_parallel+0x384>
    4037d41c:   08 00 02 40     nop

This is the inner loop of bit_spin_lock which is called by hlist_bl_unlock in
d_alloc_parallel:

static inline void bit_spin_lock(int bitnum, unsigned long *addr)
{
        /*
         * Assuming the lock is uncontended, this never enters
         * the body of the outer loop. If it is contended, then
         * within the inner loop a non-atomic test is used to
         * busywait with less bus contention for a good time to
         * attempt to acquire the lock bit.
         */
        preempt_disable();
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
        while (unlikely(test_and_set_bit_lock(bitnum, addr))) {
                preempt_enable();
                do {
                        cpu_relax();
                } while (test_bit(bitnum, addr));
                preempt_disable();
        }
#endif
        __acquire(bitlock);
}

After consideration, I realized that we must be losing bit unlocks.
Then, I noticed that we missed defining atomic64_set_release().
Adding this define fixes the stalls in bit operations.

Signed-off-by: Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2020
Move all allocations outside of the regulator_lock()ed section.

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.7.13+ torvalds#535 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
f2fs_discard-179:7/702 is trying to acquire lock:
c0e5d920 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x2c0

but task is already holding lock:
cb95b080 (&dcc->cmd_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __issue_discard_cmd+0xec/0x5f8

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

[...]

-> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28
       __kmalloc_track_caller+0x54/0x218
       kstrdup+0x40/0x5c
       create_regulator+0xf4/0x368
       regulator_resolve_supply+0x1a0/0x200
       regulator_register+0x9c8/0x163c

[...]

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  regulator_list_mutex --> &sit_i->sentry_lock --> &dcc->cmd_lock

[...]

Fixes: f8702f9 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6eebc99b2474f4ffaa0405b15178ece0e7e4f608.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
Like other tunneling interfaces, the bareudp doesn't need TXLOCK.
So, It is good to set the NETIF_F_LLTX flag to improve performance and
to avoid lockdep's false-positive warning.

Test commands:
    ip netns add A
    ip netns add B
    ip link add veth0 netns A type veth peer name veth1 netns B
    ip netns exec A ip link set veth0 up
    ip netns exec A ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev veth0
    ip netns exec B ip link set veth1 up
    ip netns exec B ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev veth1

    for i in {2..1}
    do
            let A=$i-1
            ip netns exec A ip link add bareudp$i type bareudp \
		    dstport $i ethertype ip
            ip netns exec A ip link set bareudp$i up
            ip netns exec A ip a a 10.0.$i.1/24 dev bareudp$i
            ip netns exec A ip r a 10.0.$i.2 encap ip src 10.0.$A.1 \
		    dst 10.0.$A.2 via 10.0.$i.2 dev bareudp$i

            ip netns exec B ip link add bareudp$i type bareudp \
		    dstport $i ethertype ip
            ip netns exec B ip link set bareudp$i up
            ip netns exec B ip a a 10.0.$i.2/24 dev bareudp$i
            ip netns exec B ip r a 10.0.$i.1 encap ip src 10.0.$A.2 \
		    dst 10.0.$A.1 via 10.0.$i.1 dev bareudp$i
    done
    ip netns exec A ping 10.0.2.2

Splat looks like:
[   96.992803][  T822] ============================================
[   96.993954][  T822] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[   96.995102][  T822] 5.10.0+ torvalds#819 Not tainted
[   96.995927][  T822] --------------------------------------------
[   96.997091][  T822] ping/822 is trying to acquire lock:
[   96.998083][  T822] ffff88810f753898 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[   96.999813][  T822]
[   96.999813][  T822] but task is already holding lock:
[   97.001192][  T822] ffff88810c385498 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[   97.002908][  T822]
[   97.002908][  T822] other info that might help us debug this:
[   97.004401][  T822]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   97.004401][  T822]
[   97.005784][  T822]        CPU0
[   97.006407][  T822]        ----
[   97.007010][  T822]   lock(_xmit_NONE#2);
[   97.007779][  T822]   lock(_xmit_NONE#2);
[   97.008550][  T822]
[   97.008550][  T822]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   97.008550][  T822]
[   97.010057][  T822]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   97.010057][  T822]
[   97.011594][  T822] 7 locks held by ping/822:
[   97.012426][  T822]  #0: ffff888109a144f0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_sendmsg+0x12f7/0x2b00
[   97.014191][  T822]  #1: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x249/0x2020
[   97.016045][  T822]  #2: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1fd/0x2960
[   97.017897][  T822]  #3: ffff88810c385498 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[   97.019684][  T822]  #4: ffffffffbce2f600 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bareudp_xmit+0x31b/0x3690 [bareudp]
[   97.021573][  T822]  #5: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x249/0x2020
[   97.023424][  T822]  #6: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1fd/0x2960
[   97.025259][  T822]
[   97.025259][  T822] stack backtrace:
[   97.026349][  T822] CPU: 3 PID: 822 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.10.0+ torvalds#819
[   97.027609][  T822] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[   97.029407][  T822] Call Trace:
[   97.030015][  T822]  dump_stack+0x99/0xcb
[   97.030783][  T822]  __lock_acquire.cold.77+0x149/0x3a9
[   97.031773][  T822]  ? stack_trace_save+0x81/0xa0
[   97.032661][  T822]  ? register_lock_class+0x1910/0x1910
[   97.033673][  T822]  ? register_lock_class+0x1910/0x1910
[   97.034679][  T822]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0
[   97.035697][  T822]  ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xa0/0xa0
[   97.036690][  T822]  lock_acquire+0x1b2/0x730
[   97.037515][  T822]  ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[   97.038466][  T822]  ? check_flags+0x50/0x50
[   97.039277][  T822]  ? netif_skb_features+0x296/0x9c0
[   97.040226][  T822]  ? validate_xmit_skb+0x29/0xb10
[   97.041151][  T822]  _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[   97.041977][  T822]  ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[   97.042927][  T822]  __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[   97.043852][  T822]  ? netdev_core_pick_tx+0x290/0x290
[   97.044824][  T822]  ? mark_held_locks+0xb7/0x120
[   97.045712][  T822]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x12c/0x3e0
[   97.046824][  T822]  ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0
[   97.047771][  T822]  ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0
[   97.048710][  T822]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x41/0x120
[   97.049626][  T822]  ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0
[   97.050556][  T822]  ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0
[   97.051509][  T822]  ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0
[   97.052443][  T822]  ? check_chain_key+0x244/0x5f0
[   97.053352][  T822]  ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0x56/0xa0
[   97.054317][  T822]  ? ip_finish_output2+0x6ea/0x2020
[   97.055263][  T822]  ? pneigh_lookup+0x410/0x410
[   97.056135][  T822]  ip_finish_output2+0x6ea/0x2020
[ ... ]

Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Fixes: 571912c ("net: UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS, IP, NSH etc.")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201228152136.24215-1-ap420073@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
Ido Schimmel says:

====================
nexthop: Various fixes

This series contains various fixes for the nexthop code. The bugs were
uncovered during the development of resilient nexthop groups.

Patches #1-#2 fix the error path of nexthop_create_group(). I was not
able to trigger these bugs with current code, but it is possible with
the upcoming resilient nexthop groups code which adds a user
controllable memory allocation further in the function.

Patch #3 fixes wrong validation of netlink attributes.

Patch #4 fixes wrong invocation of mausezahn in a selftest.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210107144824.1135691-1-idosch@idosch.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2021
We had kernel panic, it is caused by unload module and last
close confirmation.

call trace:
[1196029.743127]  free_sess+0x15/0x50 [rtrs_client]
[1196029.743128]  rtrs_clt_close+0x4c/0x70 [rtrs_client]
[1196029.743129]  ? rnbd_clt_unmap_device+0x1b0/0x1b0 [rnbd_client]
[1196029.743130]  close_rtrs+0x25/0x50 [rnbd_client]
[1196029.743131]  rnbd_client_exit+0x93/0xb99 [rnbd_client]
[1196029.743132]  __x64_sys_delete_module+0x190/0x260

And in the crashdump confirmation kworker is also running.
PID: 6943   TASK: ffff9e2ac8098000  CPU: 4   COMMAND: "kworker/4:2"
 #0 [ffffb206cf337c30] __schedule at ffffffff9f93f891
 #1 [ffffb206cf337cc8] schedule at ffffffff9f93fe98
 #2 [ffffb206cf337cd0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9f943938
 #3 [ffffb206cf337d50] wait_for_completion at ffffffff9f9410a7
 #4 [ffffb206cf337da0] __flush_work at ffffffff9f08ce0e
 #5 [ffffb206cf337e20] rtrs_clt_close_conns at ffffffffc0d5f668 [rtrs_client]
 #6 [ffffb206cf337e48] rtrs_clt_close at ffffffffc0d5f801 [rtrs_client]
 linux-kernel-labs#7 [ffffb206cf337e68] close_rtrs at ffffffffc0d26255 [rnbd_client]
 linux-kernel-labs#8 [ffffb206cf337e78] free_sess at ffffffffc0d262ad [rnbd_client]
 linux-kernel-labs#9 [ffffb206cf337e88] rnbd_clt_put_dev at ffffffffc0d266a7 [rnbd_client]

The problem is both code path try to close same session, which lead to
panic.

To fix it, just skip the sess if the refcount already drop to 0.

Fixes: f7a7a5c ("block/rnbd: client: main functionality")
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
dbaluta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2022
…e_zone

btrfs_can_activate_zone() can be called with the device_list_mutex already
held, which will lead to a deadlock:

insert_dev_extents() // Takes device_list_mutex
`-> insert_dev_extent()
 `-> btrfs_insert_empty_item()
  `-> btrfs_insert_empty_items()
   `-> btrfs_search_slot()
    `-> btrfs_cow_block()
     `-> __btrfs_cow_block()
      `-> btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
       `-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
        `-> find_free_extent()
         `-> find_free_extent_update_loop()
          `-> can_allocate_chunk()
           `-> btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Takes device_list_mutex again

Instead of using the RCU on fs_devices->device_list we
can use fs_devices->alloc_list, protected by the chunk_mutex to traverse
the list of active devices.

We are in the chunk allocation thread. The newer chunk allocation
happens from the devices in the fs_device->alloc_list protected by the
chunk_mutex.

  btrfs_create_chunk()
    lockdep_assert_held(&info->chunk_mutex);
    gather_device_info
      list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->alloc_list, dev_alloc_list)

Also, a device that reappears after the mount won't join the alloc_list
yet and, it will be in the dev_list, which we don't want to consider in
the context of the chunk alloc.

  [15.166572] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  [15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis linux-kernel-labs#79 Not tainted
  [15.167487] --------------------------------------------
  [15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 is trying to acquire lock:
  [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.167733]
  [15.167733] but task is already holding lock:
  [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
  [15.167733]
  [15.167733] other info that might help us debug this:
  [15.167733]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
  [15.167733]
  [15.171834]        CPU0
  [15.171834]        ----
  [15.171834]   lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [15.171834]   lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [15.171834]
  [15.171834]  *** DEADLOCK ***
  [15.171834]
  [15.171834]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
  [15.171834]
  [15.171834] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:3/146:
  [15.171834]  #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
  [15.171834]  #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
  [15.176244]  #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs]
  [15.176244]  #3: ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
  [15.176244]  #4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs]
  [15.179641]
  [15.179641] stack backtrace:
  [15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis linux-kernel-labs#79
  [15.179641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 04/01/2014
  [15.179641] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
  [15.179641] Call Trace:
  [15.179641]  <TASK>
  [15.179641]  dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59
  [15.179641]  __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2
  [15.179641]  lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0
  [15.183838]  ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970
  [15.183838]  ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
  [15.183838]  ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40
  [15.183838]  ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb5/0x3b0 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x600 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_cow_block+0x10f/0x230 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_search_slot+0x55f/0xbc0 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
  [15.187601]  btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x2d/0x60 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2b3/0x560 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  __btrfs_end_transaction+0x36/0x2a0 [btrfs]
  [15.192037]  flush_space+0x374/0x600 [btrfs]
  [15.192037]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
  [15.192037]  ? btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x49/0x180 [btrfs]
  [15.192037]  ? lock_release+0x131/0x2b0
  [15.192037]  btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x70/0x180 [btrfs]
  [15.192037]  process_one_work+0x24c/0x5a0
  [15.192037]  worker_thread+0x4a/0x3d0

Fixes: a85f05e ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant