Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New-DbaComputerCertificate - Only use MonthsValid for self-signed certificates #9318

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

andreasjordan
Copy link
Contributor

…cate)

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change, fixes an issue with pr New-DbaComputerCertificate, options for Algorithm and Period validity #9264 )
  • New feature (non-breaking change, adds functionality, fixes # )
  • Breaking change (affects multiple commands or functionality, fixes # )
  • Ran manual Pester test and has passed (.\tests\manual.pester.ps1)
  • Adding code coverage to existing functionality
  • Pester test is included
  • If new file reference added for test, has is been added to github.com/dataplat/appveyor-lab ?
  • Unit test is included
  • Documentation
  • Build system

See comments on #9264 for details.

Summary: NotBefore and NotAfter are only valid for RequestType = Cert, which are the self-signed certificates. They are not valid for the others as they use RequestType = PKCS10. See documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/certreq_1

@potatoqualitee
Copy link
Member

thanks, man. i did not know that. looks good.

@potatoqualitee potatoqualitee merged commit 95c9644 into development Apr 11, 2024
12 checks passed
@potatoqualitee potatoqualitee deleted the NewDbaComputerCertificate_fix branch April 11, 2024 07:44
@andreasjordan andreasjordan changed the title New-DbaComputerCertifficate - Only use MonthsValid for self-signed certificates New-DbaComputerCertificate - Only use MonthsValid for self-signed certificates Apr 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants