Skip to content

feat(ingest/snowflake): generate lineage through temp views #13517

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hsheth2
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsheth2 hsheth2 commented May 14, 2025

Stacked on top of #13383

Still pending

  • tests
  • adding a counter to the report

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata label May 14, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.94340% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...hub/ingestion/source/snowflake/snowflake_schema.py 53.33% 14 Missing ⚠️
...ub/ingestion/source/snowflake/snowflake_queries.py 20.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
...ahub/ingestion/source/snowflake/snowflake_query.py 66.66% 2 Missing ⚠️
...ingestion/source/snowflake/snowflake_schema_gen.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Comment on lines -46 to -52
ACCESS_HISTORY_TABLE_DOMAINS_FILTER = (
"("
f"'{SnowflakeObjectDomain.TABLE.capitalize()}',"
f"'{SnowflakeObjectDomain.VIEW.capitalize()}',"
f"'{SnowflakeObjectDomain.STREAM.capitalize()}',"
")"
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so this was just unused ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup - it was an unrelated cleanup

@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added the pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter label May 14, 2025
@datahub-cyborg datahub-cyborg bot added needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer. and removed pending-submitter-response Issue/request has been reviewed but requires a response from the submitter labels May 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ingestion PR or Issue related to the ingestion of metadata needs-review Label for PRs that need review from a maintainer.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants