exclude some materialized views from query rewriting #57
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
suremarc
added a commit
to massive-com/datafusion-materialized-views
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2025
…rib#57) * exclude some materialized views from query rewriting * newline at EOF * fmt
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sometimes we do not want to consider materialized views in query rewriting, for example if the table is brand new and doesn't have any data, or if it is broken for some reason or another. This PR adds a new configuration struct to control behavior of MV-related features, in this case whether or not query rewrite will take advantage of a table.