Conversation
codycooperross
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a great start, @ashwinisukale , but can you also add tests for the new relatedIdentifierType, contributorType, relationType, and dateType values? See the summary of changes here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RllY4Q-_Ls9gHSfy9Iuwlctv0uV4E_S6Sg56rvkMt1o/edit#heading=h.76dlmbn6ivq4
svogt0511
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How does this release play with the stylistic changes that Kelly is doing? Are they being released at the same time?
@KellyStathis I'm not sure I have the most context on this—can you provide some insight? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have added most of the test cases in this file, instead of having multiple files for testing different part of the XML. I will create a issue which will clean all the tests inside schema. Right now they are all having incorrect file path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good. The only one I don't see is 'dateType: Coverage'. That may be elsewhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thats was a good catch, adding it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just added all the date types and tested its presence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2nd ResourceTypeGeneral in other_spec.rb should have 'Project' instead of 'Award'?
Sorry @codycooperross and @svogt0511 I missed this last week. The redesign of the schema site is on track to launch at the end of October. Once that's complete, I would merge those changes into this |
codycooperross
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think one of the last pieces of this work, assuming that all the new values are tested as valid against the XSD, is to copy all of the spec/kernel-4.6 tests to the spec/kernel-4 folder. These two should be identical, to my memory, because the XSD is identical as well. @svogt0511 does that sound right?
I have created a ticket which will address this #146 here I am also addressing correction of test cases in other versions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As far as I can see my comments have been addressed. I am going to approve this pending resolution of Cody's comments. I assume that this is not going to be released until @KellyStathis is ready to make the announcement of 4.6, and at that time, everything related to 4.6 will be released. I am also assuming that 4.6 is scheduled to go after the October release of the site format/css changes.
# Conflicts: # source/_versions.html.md.erb # source/meta/kernel-4/index.html.md
| <date dateType="Available">2024-01-01</date> | ||
| </dates> | ||
| <descriptions> | ||
| <description xml:lang="en" descriptionType="Abstract">This chapter reviews selected landmarks ocurred in Chemistry basic research in the last 5 years</description> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| <description xml:lang="en" descriptionType="Abstract">This chapter reviews selected landmarks ocurred in Chemistry basic research in the last 5 years</description> | |
| <description xml:lang="en" descriptionType="Abstract">This chapter reviews selected landmarks occurred in Chemistry basic research in the last 5 years</description> |
ref:
Purpose
closes: #141
Approach
Open Questions and Pre-Merge TODOs
Learning
Types of changes
Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
Reviewer, please remember our guidelines: