Skip to content

Conversation

alexott
Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott commented Aug 13, 2025

Changes

Tests

  • make test run locally
  • relevant change in docs/ folder
  • covered with integration tests in internal/acceptance
  • using Go SDK
  • using TF Plugin Framework
  • has entry in NEXT_CHANGELOG.md file

@alexott alexott requested review from a team as code owners August 13, 2025 07:20
@alexott alexott requested review from hectorcast-db and removed request for a team August 13, 2025 07:20
@alexott alexott temporarily deployed to test-trigger-is August 13, 2025 07:20 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link

If integration tests don't run automatically, an authorized user can run them manually by following the instructions below:

Trigger:
go/deco-tests-run/terraform

Inputs:

  • PR number: 4929
  • Commit SHA: 11394ba3366237715dd223a27f4991cc52bc081c

Checks will be approved automatically on success.

@alexott alexott temporarily deployed to test-trigger-is August 13, 2025 07:21 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@alexott alexott added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 13, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 415400f Aug 13, 2025
12 checks passed
@alexott alexott deleted the doc/deprecate-data-source-id branch August 13, 2025 08:08
deco-sdk-tagging bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
## Release v1.87.0

### Bug Fixes

* Suppress `data_security_mode` aliases for `databricks_cluster` resource ([#4911](#4911)).

### Documentation

* Document `email_notifications` block in model serving resources ([#4910](#4910))
* Deprecate `data_source_id` attribute in `databricks_sql_endpoint` resource ([#4929](#4929))
* Deprecate `databricks_sql_visualization` and `databricks_sql_widget` resource. ([#4924](#4924))
* Document `APPLY_TAG` privilege for `databricks_volume` grants ([#4928](#4928))

### Internal Changes
* Added integration test for METRIC_VIEW table type in `databricks_grant` and `databricks_grants` ([#4927](#4927))
* Update Go SDK to v0.80.0 ([#4932](#4932))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants