Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgraded to spark 2.0 #389

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

davidcrossland
Copy link

No description provided.

blrnw3 and others added 5 commits February 10, 2016 17:59
Currently a lot of functionality is hidden behind private access modifiers making it difficult to extend the functionality of the parsers without copying large chunks of code. These small changes make re-use much easier.
Was able to reinstate some of the access modifiers and instead extracted out extensible code from those methods into new overridable methods.
Added some hierarchy to the parsers/readers so they can be switched out.
@falaki
Copy link
Member

falaki commented Oct 25, 2016

@davidcrossland this package is not supposed to work with Spark 2.0. spark-csv has been inlined in Apache Spark 2.0

@davidcrossland
Copy link
Author

This related to a fork of spark-csv which was used by https://github.com/quartethealth/spark-fixedwidth, i needed to make use of this project for a customer. Unluckily it didnt work with spark 2.0, so i was forced to upgrade it. This was only intended to be a pull request for that specific repo, certainly not for the main codebase. Hopefully once Spark 2.0 is released i will be able to update that project, you could take a look at integrating fixed width files in spark-csv and save me a job ;)

@falaki
Copy link
Member

falaki commented Oct 26, 2016

I see. Spark 2.0 was released a few months ago. Feel free to close this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants