-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
Propagate error in TFetchResults #255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jackyhu-db
merged 1 commit into
databricks:main
from
vikrantpuppala:fix-errors-in-fetch-results
Mar 18, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you check the r.error and return r.error instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jackyhu-db I think it is possible to do a check like that, but I would like to clarify what is the use of
HasNextifNextitself can just returnnil, io.EOFto signify an end of the stream?My question is more structural: why the additional complexity of
HasNextwhenNextitself can interface and encapsulate the concept ofHasNext? It is possible to now check for the error inr.ResultPageIterator.errand bubble that up, but I'm afraid any divergence betweenNext's logic andHasNext's logic in the future can lead to similar problemsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is worth considering whether
HasNextcan be simply rewritten as:r.ResultPageIterator.Next() == (nil, io.EOF), and if so, it is not really useful to keep it, any consumer of ResultPageIterator can useNextfor the purpose of checking whether there are any items left or notThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jackyhu-db, we would also need to update the function signature to return (bool, error) and also make changes to https://github.com/databricks/databricks-sql-go/blob/main/internal/rows/arrowbased/arrowRecordIterator.go#L86 to also return the error, do we want to go down that route?