Skip to content

Conversation

@knst
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst commented Jul 21, 2025

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

upgradetohd has 3rd argument 'passphrase' specially for encrypted wallet but it is ignored for Descriptor Wallet and wallet should be manually unlocked before call of upgradetohd.

What was done?

RPC upgradetohd actually works now with enctypred Descriptor Wallets without requirement to unlock them first.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tests to be merged in #6763

Breaking Changes

N/A

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

@knst knst added this to the 23 milestone Jul 21, 2025
@knst knst force-pushed the fix-upgradetohd-passphrase branch from 9c0242f to ae49943 Compare July 25, 2025 06:11
@github-actions
Copy link

✅ No Merge Conflicts Detected

This PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs.

@knst knst marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2025 06:13
@knst knst requested review from PastaPastaPasta and UdjinM6 July 25, 2025 06:13
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The change updates the implementation of the CWallet::UpgradeToHD method in src/wallet/wallet.cpp. It introduces explicit handling for encrypted wallets when upgrading to HD with descriptor wallets. The method now checks if the wallet is both encrypted and uses descriptors, enforcing that a non-empty passphrase is provided. It attempts to unlock the wallet with the supplied passphrase, returns an error if unlocking fails, and relocks the wallet after setting up descriptor script pubkey managers. The logic for non-descriptor wallets remains unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f3e4fa and ae49943.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/wallet/wallet.cpp (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)

src/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}: Dash Core C++ codebase must be written in C++20 and require at least Clang 16 or GCC 11.1
Dash uses unordered_lru_cache for efficient caching with LRU eviction

Files:

  • src/wallet/wallet.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: linux64_multiprocess-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: mac-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: arm-linux-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: linux64_nowallet-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: linux64_tsan-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: linux64_fuzz-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: linux64-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: linux64_sqlite-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: linux64_ubsan-build / Build source
  • GitHub Check: win64-build / Build source
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/wallet/wallet.cpp (1)

3225-3242: LGTM! Excellent implementation of encrypted descriptor wallet support.

This code correctly addresses the PR objective by enabling the upgradetohd RPC to work with encrypted descriptor wallets without requiring manual unlocking. The implementation properly:

  1. Validates encryption state: Checks if the wallet is encrypted using IsCrypted()
  2. Enforces passphrase requirement: Returns a clear error if no passphrase is provided for encrypted wallets
  3. Handles unlock/relock securely: Unlocks the wallet for the operation and properly relocks it afterward
  4. Provides clear error messages: Meaningful error messages for both empty passphrase and incorrect passphrase scenarios

The logic flow is sound and follows established patterns in the codebase for handling encrypted wallet operations.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK ae49943

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK ae49943

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 86071f9 into dashpay:develop Jul 30, 2025
33 of 35 checks passed
@knst knst deleted the fix-upgradetohd-passphrase branch July 30, 2025 17:46
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2025
…r wallets same as legacy wallets

ae49943 refactor: drop unused includes from wallet.cpp (Konstantin Akimov)
10d9a67 fix: let upgradetohd work for encrypted Descriptor wallets same as legacy wallets (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  `upgradetohd` has 3rd argument 'passphrase' specially for encrypted wallet but it is ignored for Descriptor Wallet and wallet should be manually unlocked before call of `upgradetohd`.

  ## What was done?
  RPC `upgradetohd` actually works now with enctypred Descriptor Wallets without requirement to unlock them first.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Tests to be merged in dashpay#6763

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK ae49943
  UdjinM6:
    utACK ae49943

Tree-SHA512: 8c342cb4f5c76689c8e6f9fc36fbc59e8cd9ada75065b2a9a43896171dab1f4c41a7dd3f8a8edcb1f9918bcff675dbecf45cd5df32306c704f45e362853ce168
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
…r wallets same as legacy wallets

ae49943 refactor: drop unused includes from wallet.cpp (Konstantin Akimov)
10d9a67 fix: let upgradetohd work for encrypted Descriptor wallets same as legacy wallets (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  `upgradetohd` has 3rd argument 'passphrase' specially for encrypted wallet but it is ignored for Descriptor Wallet and wallet should be manually unlocked before call of `upgradetohd`.

  ## What was done?
  RPC `upgradetohd` actually works now with enctypred Descriptor Wallets without requirement to unlock them first.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Tests to be merged in dashpay#6763

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK ae49943
  UdjinM6:
    utACK ae49943

Tree-SHA512: 8c342cb4f5c76689c8e6f9fc36fbc59e8cd9ada75065b2a9a43896171dab1f4c41a7dd3f8a8edcb1f9918bcff675dbecf45cd5df32306c704f45e362853ce168
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
…r wallets same as legacy wallets

ae49943 refactor: drop unused includes from wallet.cpp (Konstantin Akimov)
10d9a67 fix: let upgradetohd work for encrypted Descriptor wallets same as legacy wallets (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  `upgradetohd` has 3rd argument 'passphrase' specially for encrypted wallet but it is ignored for Descriptor Wallet and wallet should be manually unlocked before call of `upgradetohd`.

  ## What was done?
  RPC `upgradetohd` actually works now with enctypred Descriptor Wallets without requirement to unlock them first.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Tests to be merged in dashpay#6763

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK ae49943
  UdjinM6:
    utACK ae49943

Tree-SHA512: 8c342cb4f5c76689c8e6f9fc36fbc59e8cd9ada75065b2a9a43896171dab1f4c41a7dd3f8a8edcb1f9918bcff675dbecf45cd5df32306c704f45e362853ce168
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants