Skip to content

Conversation

@knst
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst commented Apr 23, 2025

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

While implementing #6631 found instability in feature_governance.py

What was done?

Governance votes are not delivered instantly between notes. If any vote is delayed a bit the wrong amount of votes will be remembered and test will fail further when comparing its count.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested locally with changes from #6631
without them - 90+% probability feature_governance.py to fail, with them - no failure happens locally.

Breaking Changes

N/A

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

@knst knst added this to the 23 milestone Apr 23, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The change introduces an additional synchronization step in the test script for governance functionality. After verifying the presence of "No" votes on two governance triggers, the test now logs a message indicating it will wait for all 24 votes to be counted. It then waits until node 1 reports a total of 24 governance votes. This step ensures that the test only proceeds once all expected votes have been registered, providing a stricter synchronization point before moving on to the next test actions. No changes were made to the declarations of exported or public entities.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between db5d000 and be9cf82.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/functional/feature_governance.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
test/functional/feature_governance.py (1)
test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py (1)
  • wait_until (900-901)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/functional/feature_governance.py (1)

282-283: Well-crafted fix for intermittent test failures.

This synchronization point ensures that all 24 governance votes are properly propagated before the test proceeds to the next stages. This addresses the root cause of the intermittent failures where tests would fail due to votes not being instantly delivered between nodes.

The timeout of 5 seconds aligns with other wait operations in this file, providing sufficient time for vote propagation across nodes.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK be9cf82

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 677529c into dashpay:develop Apr 25, 2025
30 of 31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants