-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
backport: bitcoin#18038, #14193, #17564, #17999, #18740, #19096, #16426, #17737, #18698: deglobalization backports (part 2) #4801
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pls see below + https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/commits/pr4801 + rebasing after #4826 should help a bit
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
b36dfad to
0f3ad04
Compare
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK for merging via merge commit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like I messed up in 784ba27 - it's incomplete (wallet crashes on testnet due to potential deadlocks) and fixing it makes things look ugly and fragile... Sorry! 🙈 let's revert changes added via 784ba27 (880320f) and apply 8e5c343 and 2f5339d instead. I think it should work but pls test it too!
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, it looks stable now :)
ACK
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, ACK
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK for merging via merge commit
|
LGTM but 16426 was built on top of 16034 originally and we backport 16034 in #4679 which should be merged first imo. This PR should be rebased after that. |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
… improve wallet privacy
Co-authored-by: "UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>"
… cs_main locking Co-authored-by: "UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>"
Co-authored-by: "UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>"
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, re-ACK
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK for merging via merge commit
Made possible with significant contributions by @UdjinM6