Skip to content

Conversation

@kwvg
Copy link
Collaborator

@kwvg kwvg commented Apr 23, 2022

Made possible with significant contributions by @UdjinM6

@kwvg kwvg marked this pull request as draft April 23, 2022 08:04
@kwvg kwvg force-pushed the deglobalization2 branch from 164ac72 to e055b70 Compare April 24, 2022 10:53
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pls see below + https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/commits/pr4801 + rebasing after #4826 should help a bit

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 2, 2022

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

@kwvg kwvg force-pushed the deglobalization2 branch from e055b70 to 320d868 Compare May 3, 2022 03:51
@kwvg kwvg force-pushed the deglobalization2 branch from 320d868 to 2957eed Compare May 5, 2022 15:00
@kwvg kwvg requested a review from UdjinM6 May 5, 2022 15:01
@kwvg kwvg force-pushed the deglobalization2 branch 4 times, most recently from b36dfad to 0f3ad04 Compare May 6, 2022 18:35
@UdjinM6
Copy link

UdjinM6 commented May 7, 2022

pls see https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/commits/pr4801

@kwvg kwvg force-pushed the deglobalization2 branch from 0f3ad04 to a9aa5d0 Compare May 7, 2022 16:02
@kwvg kwvg marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2022 19:51
@kwvg kwvg requested a review from PastaPastaPasta May 8, 2022 07:51
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK for merging via merge commit

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta changed the title merge bitcoin#18038, #14193, #17564, #17999, #18740, #19096: deglobalization backports (part 2) backport: bitcoin#18038, #14193, #17564, #17999, #18740, #19096: deglobalization backports (part 2) May 10, 2022
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 18.1 milestone May 10, 2022
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 changed the title backport: bitcoin#18038, #14193, #17564, #17999, #18740, #19096: deglobalization backports (part 2) backport: bitcoin#18038, #14193, #17564, #17999, #18740, #19096, #16426, #17737, #18698: deglobalization backports (part 2) May 10, 2022
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like I messed up in 784ba27 - it's incomplete (wallet crashes on testnet due to potential deadlocks) and fixing it makes things look ugly and fragile... Sorry! 🙈 let's revert changes added via 784ba27 (880320f) and apply 8e5c343 and 2f5339d instead. I think it should work but pls test it too!

UdjinM6
UdjinM6 previously approved these changes May 12, 2022
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, it looks stable now :)

ACK

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

UdjinM6
UdjinM6 previously approved these changes May 16, 2022
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, ACK

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK for merging via merge commit

@kwvg kwvg requested a review from UdjinM6 May 17, 2022 17:26
@UdjinM6
Copy link

UdjinM6 commented May 17, 2022

LGTM but 16426 was built on top of 16034 originally and we backport 16034 in #4679 which should be merged first imo. This PR should be rebased after that.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, re-ACK

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK for merging via merge commit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants