Skip to content

Conversation

@amery
Copy link
Contributor

@amery amery commented Jul 14, 2025

Summary

This PR adds comprehensive tests for type conversion utilities in as.go:

  • Generic type conversion functions (As, AsFn)
  • Slice conversion functions (SliceAs, SliceAsFn)
  • Error conversion functions (AsError, AsErrors)

Test Coverage

Adds 556 lines of comprehensive test code in as_test.go covering:

  • As[T] and AsFn[T] generic type conversions
  • SliceAs[T,S] and SliceAsFn[T,S] slice conversions
  • AsError and AsErrors error interface conversions
  • Edge cases: nil inputs, invalid conversions, panic scenarios

Performance

Benchmarks demonstrate excellent performance with zero allocations for most operations:

BenchmarkAs-8         1000000000    0.5717 ns/op    0 B/op    0 allocs/op
BenchmarkAsFn-8       1000000000    0.4926 ns/op    0 B/op    0 allocs/op
BenchmarkSliceAs-8    8860906       155.4 ns/op     160 B/op  1 allocs/op
BenchmarkAsError-8    65276212      17.91 ns/op     0 B/op    0 allocs/op

Testing Approach

Table-driven tests with method-based test cases following established patterns.

Related

Part of comprehensive test coverage improvement initiative.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive unit tests for type conversion utilities, covering various input scenarios and edge cases.
    • Introduced benchmark tests to measure performance of conversion functions.
    • Included tests for custom error types and generic behaviours.
    • Added edge case tests to ensure correct error and panic handling.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Walkthrough

A new test file introduces comprehensive unit tests and benchmarks for generic type conversion and error handling utilities in the core package. It covers various functions, including As, AsFn, SliceAs, SliceAsFn, AsError, and AsErrors, with custom test cases, error types, and edge case handling.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
core/as_test.go Added extensive unit tests and benchmarks for type conversion and error extraction utilities, including custom error types, multiple test case structs, edge case coverage, and performance benchmarks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as test runner
    participant AsFn as Conversion Function
    participant AsError as Error Extractor

    Test->>AsFn: Call As, AsFn, SliceAs, SliceAsFn
    AsFn-->>Test: Return converted value or error

    Test->>AsError: Call AsError, AsErrors
    AsError-->>Test: Return extracted error(s)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • karasz

Poem

In the warren of code, a new test suite appears,
With conversions and errors, it silences fears.
Benchmarks are hopping, results in a row,
Rabbits rejoice as the coverage does grow!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0614db and 2e88fed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • as_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
**/*.go

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENT.md
**/*_test.go

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENT.md
**/*

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENT.md
**/*.{md,go}

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENT.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Comprehensive coverage for generic functions is expected in tests.
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Helper functions like `S[T]()` should be used to create test slices in Go tests.
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Table-driven tests are preferred for Go tests.
as_test.go (3)
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Comprehensive coverage for generic functions is expected in tests.
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Helper functions like `S[T]()` should be used to create test slices in Go tests.
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Table-driven tests are preferred for Go tests.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
as_test.go (2)
as.go (6)
  • As (4-7)
  • AsFn (10-17)
  • SliceAs (20-22)
  • SliceAsFn (26-42)
  • AsError (51-73)
  • AsErrors (77-82)
slices_test.go (1)
  • S (8-8)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
as_test.go (4)

18-18: Revive directive usage is appropriate for test complexity

The complexity disable directive is acceptable here as the test helper method handles multiple type assertions for comprehensive testing coverage.


122-145: Well-designed custom error types for comprehensive testing

The custom error types errorWithAsError and errorWithOK provide excellent test coverage for the different error interface patterns supported by the AsError function.


484-518: Appropriate benchmark tests for performance validation

The benchmark tests cover the key functions with realistic input scenarios, enabling performance regression detection.


542-556: Good edge case coverage for panic propagation

The panic test ensures that SliceAsFn correctly propagates panics from conversion functions, providing important safety guarantees.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch test/type-conversion

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@deepsource-io
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 1507bee..2e88fed. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Shell LogoShell✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Go LogoGo✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
as_test.go (1)

557-557: Add newline at end of file.

According to the coding guidelines, all files should end with a newline character.

 	_ = SliceAsFn(panicFn, []any{"will panic"})
 }
+
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
as_test.go (2)

17-56: Method exceeds the 40-line function limit.

The test method is exactly 40 lines (17-56), which meets but doesn't exceed the limit. However, it's quite complex with multiple switch cases. Consider refactoring into smaller helper methods for better maintainability.


43-43: Consider using errors.Is() for error comparison.

Direct string comparison of error messages might not work correctly for wrapped errors or errors with dynamic content. Consider using errors.Is() for more robust error comparison, especially if testing error types rather than exact messages.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 337d17e and 717a077.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • as_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
**/*.go

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENT.md
**/*_test.go

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENT.md
**/*

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENT.md
**/*.{md,go}

Instructions used from:

Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine

  • AGENT.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Comprehensive coverage for generic functions is expected in tests.
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Table-driven tests are preferred for Go tests.
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Helper functions like `S[T]()` should be used to create test slices in Go tests.
as_test.go (3)
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Comprehensive coverage for generic functions is expected in tests.
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Helper functions like `S[T]()` should be used to create test slices in Go tests.
Learnt from: CR
PR: darvaza-proxy/core#0
File: AGENT.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T13:13:22.040Z
Learning: Applies to **/*_test.go : Table-driven tests are preferred for Go tests.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
as_test.go (1)
as.go (6)
  • As (4-7)
  • AsFn (10-17)
  • SliceAs (20-22)
  • SliceAsFn (26-42)
  • AsError (51-73)
  • AsErrors (77-82)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
as_test.go (3)

483-518: Well-structured performance benchmarks.

The benchmarks provide good coverage of the main functions and follow Go benchmark best practices. The use of b.ResetTimer() in BenchmarkSliceAs correctly excludes setup time from measurements.


520-556: Excellent edge case coverage.

These tests effectively verify generic type conversions and panic propagation. The deferred recover pattern in TestSliceAsFnEdgeCases properly validates panic behaviour.


1-556: Comprehensive test coverage for type conversion utilities.

Excellent work on providing thorough test coverage! The tests effectively cover:

  • All exported functions with various input scenarios
  • Edge cases including nil values, empty slices, and type mismatches
  • Custom error types for testing error conversion interfaces
  • Performance benchmarks with good methodology
  • Panic propagation behaviour

The table-driven test approach aligns perfectly with Go best practices and the coding guidelines.

@amery amery requested a review from karasz July 14, 2025 23:27
@amery amery self-assigned this Jul 14, 2025
@amery amery added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 14, 2025
@amery amery force-pushed the test/type-conversion branch from 717a077 to b0614db Compare July 15, 2025 13:50
@amery
Copy link
Contributor Author

amery commented Jul 15, 2025

rebased

- Add 555 lines of test code for all functions in as.go
- Test As[T] and AsFn[T] generic type conversions
- Test SliceAs[T,S] and SliceAsFn[T,S] slice conversions
- Test AsError and AsErrors with custom error interfaces
- Add benchmarks showing zero allocations for most operations
- Include edge cases: nil inputs, panics, invalid conversions
- Improve overall test coverage to 55.0%

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Mery <amery@apptly.co>
@amery amery force-pushed the test/type-conversion branch from b0614db to 2e88fed Compare July 15, 2025 14:00
Copy link
Contributor

@karasz karasz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks very good to me.

@karasz karasz merged commit 84e83ce into main Jul 15, 2025
17 checks passed
@karasz karasz deleted the test/type-conversion branch July 15, 2025 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants