Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 23, 2024. It is now read-only.

2.0.0

  • 2.0.0
  • 1309eab

  • Verified

    This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
    GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
    Expired
    Verified
    Learn about vigilant mode
  • Compare
    Choose a tag to compare
2.0.0: Tighten type for argument to `evaluate` (#22)
  • 2.0.0
  • 1309eab
  • Compare
    Choose a tag to compare

  • Verified

    This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
    GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
    Expired
    Verified
    Learn about vigilant mode
@natebosch natebosch tagged this 24 Jan 00:41 
Taking a `dynamic` throws away the static help that a caller would get
with an argument type. Since it is easy to refactor callers currently
passing an `Iterable<String>` to tear off the `.contains` method we can
take the Function type always. This also improves inference for argument
types in places that are passing a function literal.
Assets 2
Loading