Repository navigation
Conversation
|
Ticket title is 'FIO crc mismatch detected on 4x node IB config while running HSN cable pulls test' |
Collaborator
|
Test stage Functional Hardware Large MD on SSD completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-19240/1/execution/node/1808/log |
1. In theory, it is possible that when exclude some engine, related ULT maybe trying to abort a DTX because of some failure happened during local modification (but related modification has succeeded on remote targets). Related DTX_ABORT RPC has been sent out but not been received or processed by related remote targets. Under such case, the DTX leader is switched because of related engine is exlcuded. And then DTX resync is triggered by new DTX leader who may regard such DTX as committable since all alive targets claim 'PREPARED'. Then the new DTX leader will make different decision that conflict with old DTX leader did. That may cause related DTX to be aborted on some targets but committed on the others, as to data inconsistency among related redundancy group. The new logic forbids to abort DTX from old DTX leader to avoid such inconsistency. 2. During DTX resync, the DTX CHECK RPC should not be sent to the target that will be reintegrated (with PO_COMP_ST_UP). Because such target may have removed related DTX entries. Signed-off-by: Fan Yong <fan.yong@hpe.com>
Nasf-Fan
force-pushed
the
Nasf-Fan/DAOS-19616_2
branch
from
October 11, 2026 16:48
04e9c27 to
2514142
Compare
Nasf-Fan
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 12, 2026 13:39
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In theory, it is possible that when exclude some engine, related ULT maybe trying to abort a DTX because of some failure happened during local modification (but related modification has succeeded on remote targets). Related DTX_ABORT RPC has been sent out but not been received or processed by related remote targets. Under such case, the DTX leader is switched because of related engine is exlcuded. And then DTX resync is triggered by new DTX leader who may regard such DTX as committable since all alive targets claim 'PREPARED'. Then the new DTX leader will make different decision that conflict with old DTX leader did. That may cause related DTX to be aborted on some targets but committed on the others, as to data inconsistency among related redundancy group. The new logic forbids to abort DTX from old DTX leader to avoid such inconsistency.
During DTX resync, the DTX CHECK RPC should not be sent to the target that will be reintegrated (with PO_COMP_ST_UP). Because such target may have removed related DTX entries.
Steps for the author:
After all prior steps are complete: