-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
Raise AttributeError on attempts to access unset oneof fields
#510
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Gobot1234
merged 8 commits into
danielgtaylor:master
from
a-khabarov:safer-oneof-access
Jul 21, 2023
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
921a2b7
Raise `AttributeError` on attempts to access unset `oneof` fields
a-khabarov a07cde5
Add a missing `!r` to `AttributeError` format strings
a-khabarov 6719e42
Upgrade `black`
a-khabarov 764f926
Test `oneof` pattern matching
a-khabarov 784a3c2
Fix pre-commit formatting and `sys` import location
a-khabarov 708e46b
Use `black` `23.1.0` instead of `23.0.0`
a-khabarov c9340e6
Fix `black` `pre-commit` hook
a-khabarov 7506604
Run `black` on all files
a-khabarov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a behaviour change?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR makes it impossible to use
foo.sub.val = 1whenfoo.subis unset in the group.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a bit of a tradeoff. With this change the users of
betterprotocan no longer use thefoo.sub.val = 1syntax for fields that are unset in groups, but this also means that there is less risk of them accidentally changing which field is set in a group.