Gitlab: Upgrade @gitbreaker/node from ^21.3.0 to ^35.7.0 #1327
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
need help here. as not clear how-to |
|
Describe what are you trying to do here (in PR body). gitbreaker switch is done via #1318 |
|
updated |
|
Feel free to create an MR with the fix, and I will close this one np. |
|
ok, the PR title is actually about |
|
also, seems this overlaps #1355, as those structures are now provided by the gitbreaker package? |
|
Most of the structure covered by |
ivankatliarchuk
changed the title
|
I get the recommendation to switch to @gitbeaker/rest, maybe consider this instead of just upgrading? |
|
Looks to me like #1406 did this |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
issue #1301
I'm trying to update a gitbreaker version, as the switch happen, but the version used is outdated. As latest gitbreaker version has well-defined types.
Initialy failed, seems like my approach was wrong.