Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't flag high resistance possible leaks to expected sim values. #260

Open
d-m-bailey opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Don't flag high resistance possible leaks to expected sim values. #260

d-m-bailey opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@d-m-bailey
Copy link
Owner

The expected value check can be used to check pull down/pull up signals.

The opposite logic value should still have a path, which can cause a possible leak (LEAK?) error.

If there is a high resistance to the sim level and a matching expected sim level check, then don't flag a possible leak error.
@d-m-bailey d-m-bailey changed the title Don't high resistance flag possible leaks to expected sim values. Don't flag high resistance possible leaks to expected sim values. Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@d-m-bailey