Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Decaff driver part 7 #7345

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2020
Merged

Decaff driver part 7 #7345

merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2020

Conversation

sainthkh
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #2690.

NEVER SQUASH THIS PR.

@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented May 14, 2020

Thanks for the contribution! Below are some guidelines Cypress uses when doing PR reviews.

  • Please write [WIP] in the title of your Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review - someone will review your PR as soon as the [WIP] is removed.
  • Please familiarize yourself with the PR Review Checklist and feel free to make updates on your PR based on these guidelines.

PR Review Checklist

If any of the following requirements can't be met, leave a comment in the review selecting 'Request changes', otherwise 'Approve'.

User Experience

  • The feature/bugfix is self-documenting from within the product.
  • The change provides the end user with a way to fix their problem (no dead ends).

Functionality

  • The code works and performs its intended function with the correct logic.
  • Performance has been factored in (for example, the code cleans up after itself to not cause memory leaks).
  • The code guards against edge cases and invalid input and has tests to cover it.

Maintainability

  • The code is readable (too many nested 'if's are a bad sign).
  • Names used for variables, methods, etc, clearly describe their function.
  • The code is easy to understood and there are relevant comments explaining.
  • New algorithms are documented in the code with link(s) to external docs (flowcharts, w3c, chrome, firefox).
  • There are comments containing link(s) to the addressed issue (in tests and code).

Quality

  • The change does not reimplement code.
  • There's not a module from the ecosystem that should be used instead.
  • There is no redundant or duplicate code.
  • There are no irrelevant comments left in the code.
  • Tests are testing the code’s intended functionality in the best way possible.

Internal

  • The original issue has been tagged with a release in ZenHub.

@sainthkh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Flaky failure.

@sainthkh sainthkh marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2020 08:38
@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane merged commit a4e378b into cypress-io:develop May 18, 2020
@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented May 20, 2020

Released in 4.6.0.

This comment thread has been locked. If you are still experiencing this issue after upgrading to
Cypress v4.6.0, please open a new issue.

@cypress-bot cypress-bot bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 20, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@sainthkh @jennifer-shehane