Improve some of the 2-input shaders

[cyberboy666]

No description provided.

[averagehat]

@langolierz Any particular ideas? I would be interested in working on this.

One thing would be using more parameters (for example, wipe.frag only uses 2 out of four parameters).

[cyberboy666]

awesome ! a few things come to mind quickly, one would be to make the lumakey do black keying and white keying (maybe using one of the unused params as a 'switch', as i tried to do for a->b, b->a switch ...) , or they could be separate shaders, another is to create a chromakey shader, one param for key amount, maybe another (2? to choose the colour, or ... something cant remember how now but when i had an mx50 i remember the chromakey being fun ...) yes you could add more to the wipe one , or add more wipe shaders , diagonal , circles, multi, etc i think i wrote this issue originally because i suspected the lumakey shader wasnt behaving exactly how i expected , maybe my implementation has a mistake, or maybe theres ways to make it smoother in general ... just some ideas , its a pretty open question , but i agree that the 2input shaders are really fun to play with !

…

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:13 PM Mike Panciera ***@***.***> wrote: @langolierz <https://github.com/langolierz> Any particular ideas? I would be interested in working on this. One thing would be using more parameters (for example, wipe.frag only uses 2 out of four parameters). — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#85>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC3WCETCYQFQUNFJWR36RYLQ5XJBLANCNFSM4IONLT4Q> .