-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added support for user define custom actions #376
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good with some minor comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, but could use a couple tests for the new executeCommand
, esp exercising a couple args such as restoreSelection
Paste and copy use restore selection so already tested that way. I can add some more if you like? |
Just meant having a couple tests which use |
I added a test for a custom command. More than that I don't know how to do. We do not support different arguments in custom command csv yet and none of the makeshift actions do anything that our test recorder can use. I guess I can hand craft a test case? Edit: I think a solved it. You can use define to actually move selection within the same file. Now we have two test cases one that restore selection and one that don't |
No description provided.