Skip to content

Conversation

HertzDevil
Copy link
Contributor

@HertzDevil HertzDevil commented Apr 5, 2024

Makes code like UInt128::MAX.to_f32 raise OverflowError in the interpreted code, not in the interpreter itself. Also makes UInt128::MAX.to_f32! not raise any OverflowError.

This was discovered by running spec/primitives/int_spec.cr with the interpreter.

@HertzDevil HertzDevil added kind:bug A bug in the code. Does not apply to documentation, specs, etc. topic:stdlib:numeric topic:compiler:interpreter labels Apr 5, 2024
@HertzDevil HertzDevil changed the title Fix internal overflow for UInt128#to_f32 in the interpreter Fix internal overflow for UInt128#to_f32 and #to_f32! in the interpreter Apr 5, 2024
@HertzDevil HertzDevil changed the title Fix internal overflow for UInt128#to_f32 and #to_f32! in the interpreter Fix interpreter internal overflow for UInt128#to_f32 and #to_f32! Apr 5, 2024
@straight-shoota straight-shoota added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Apr 6, 2024
@straight-shoota straight-shoota merged commit 39253d0 into crystal-lang:master Apr 8, 2024
@HertzDevil HertzDevil deleted the bug/interpreter-u128-to-f32-overflow branch April 8, 2024 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind:bug A bug in the code. Does not apply to documentation, specs, etc. topic:compiler:interpreter topic:stdlib:numeric

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants