Skip to content

Add Solaris targets #138

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 20, 2017
Merged

Add Solaris targets #138

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 20, 2017

Conversation

bgermann
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #134.

Copy link
Contributor

@malbarbo malbarbo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM. Do you intend to use compilers for Solaris 11 or 10? I'm asking because I saw your PR to rust repo.

@bgermann
Copy link
Contributor Author

I intend to use Solaris 11 cross compiler here, because that is what is used by most people. I actually only use a hack on the rust repo to have a S10 backward compatible stdlib produced. But it also works for S11 targets and is produced with an illumos sysroot. I think I am the only one using Rust on S10 up to now as I had to change some things to make it work some weeks ago.

@japaric
Copy link
Contributor

japaric commented Oct 20, 2017

Thanks @bgermann.

I'll prefer to match the rust repo version (i.e. S10) but if it's not that commonly used then S11 sounds fine. This LGTM.

@homunkulus r+

@homunkulus
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 02c7b81 has been approved by japaric

@homunkulus
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 02c7b81 with merge 359c3bb...

japaric pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2017
@homunkulus
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: japaric
Pushing 359c3bb to master...

@homunkulus homunkulus merged commit 02c7b81 into cross-rs:master Oct 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants