Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporate y4izus fix #1893

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bhancockio
Copy link
Collaborator

@bhancockio bhancockio commented Jan 14, 2025

All credit goes to @y4izus.

There was a broken test I needed to fix to merge in the PR.

Closes #1887

@joaomdmoura
Copy link
Collaborator

Disclaimer: This review was made by a crew of AI Agents.

Code Review Comment for PR #1893

Overview

This pull request introduces enhancements to the _create_manager_agent method in src/crewai/crew.py to improve how the manager language model (LLM) is resolved by introducing an additional attribute check. The new attribute lookup aims to support LLM implementations that utilize "model" instead of "model_name".

Code Quality Findings

Positive Aspects:

  1. The modification continues to follow the established fallback mechanism utilizing Python's or operator, which contributes to clean and readable code.
  2. The change adheres to the style and format of the surrounding code, maintaining consistency.
  3. This addition broadens the compatibility with various LLM APIs that adopt differing naming conventions, enhancing robustness.

Suggestions for Improvement:

  1. Documentation: Adding inline comments to clarify the purpose of each attribute being accessed in the lookup chain would significantly enhance understanding for future developers. For instance:

    self.manager_llm = (
        # Standard model_name attribute
        getattr(self.manager_llm, "model_name", None)
        # Secondary model attribute used by certain LLM providers
        or getattr(self.manager_llm, "model", None)
        # Azure deployment attribute
        or getattr(self.manager_llm, "deployment_name", None)
        # Fallback
        or self.manager_llm
    )
  2. Type Hints: Incorporating type hints for self.manager_llm would bolster code clarity and guide developers on expected input types. For example:

    self.manager_llm: Union[str, BaseLLM]
  3. Validation: Introduce a runtime type check to confirm that self.manager_llm holds a valid type (either a string or an instance of BaseLLM). This would help prevent potential runtime errors:

    if not isinstance(self.manager_llm, (str, BaseLLM)):
        raise ValueError(f"Invalid manager_llm type: {type(self.manager_llm)}")

Historical Context

Due to limitations in accessing the pull request history and other related pull requests, I recommend evaluating the commit history of src/crewai/crew.py for any recent changes related to manager LLM handling. This would provide valuable insights into the evolution of the code and can confirm whether previous attributes have posed any issues.

Relationship with Related Files

Although I cannot pull related files directly, I suggest analyzing files handling the language model logic, such as those in src/crewai/llm.py, which may be indirectly impacted by changes to the manager's LLM resolution logic.

Performance Impact

The addition of this new attribute lookup is unlikely to introduce significant overhead, as it merely adds one more conditional check in the existing resolution flow.

Security Implications

No security vulnerabilities are apparent in the proposed changes, and this modification solely enhances the logic of resolving model names.

Conclusion

The change is a safe integration into the codebase, enhancing the method's functionality without major risk. However, following up with the suggested improvements will warrant a more robust and clearer implementation. It is advised to create a subsequent pull request with these enhancements to improve maintainability.


Please feel free to reach out should you require any further insights or specific examples related to the implementation!

@bhancockio bhancockio merged commit 0532089 into main Jan 14, 2025
4 checks passed
devin-ai-integration bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants